Wow.. In a gen of 5 to 10 hour games we get one that is 100 and its not good enough....Even recent Square games are only 20-40
LOL the difference a name can make..
Nintendo posts losses and its flooded with doom and gloom about the end of Nintendo and their products are garbage..
Change the company name to Sony and it doesnt mean anything. PS3 is still the lead console in last place.
And people actually dont think this site is ran by Sony fanboys
Wii is currently 139.99 for the Wii Sportgs/Resort combo and 149.99 for the Mkwii bundle
I just see it as a way of keeping ahead of Sony. The whole "things didnt go as planned" sounds more like wishful thinking when you look at its sales WW.
Haters arent business men, they are morons.
Yes and pointing out how they do indeed make new IPs some how makes me a troll? LOL what a complete loser.
Yes kid we were playing Wii Sports, Giest, PAndroas Tower, Fire Emblem, on the Nes....
There was a reason you had 4 times as many disagrees as agrees. Jsut because you decide to be ignorant doesnt mean people have to agree with you and cant prove you wrong..
Rather than cry like a 8 eyar old school girl either learn what you are ta...
Didnt know Vita was 3D.. So 2D is now more advanced than 3D? LOL... Some people. They say stupid things just for the sake of saying stupid things and think its totally okay to be ignorant....
"Two new true next gen consoles." That statement couldnt be more ignorant....Obviously 360 and PS3 offer very little for you as whatever kind of gamer you pretend to be since you seem more interested in spreading your bias ignorance in every Wii u article..
If you ask yourself this question "Which would i rather do, play some games or spend my time whining about something I'll never own." and you choose to do the later then I'd seriously question...
Poor kid. You mad? LOL You make up stuff off the top of your head and present it as fact... always amusing.
We know nothing about whats in the Wii u let alone the PS4 or neXtbox yet here you are acting like you know everything.
Except of course how hardware development works. Cause you seem to think Sony took parts made in 2006 and were top of the line to make a console in 2006. It's just extreme ignorance like that, that makes it hard to believe you are ...
Whats a shame is you are uninformed enough to think tech from 2003 is only 5 eyars old.
You show a serious ignorance by acting like everything in the PS3 which came out in 2006 was actually top end tech in 2006... Or how 360 which came out in 2005 contained state of the art tech from 2006....
I'm sure in your rush to hate you just didnt think about what you were saying, it's better to make Nintendo look bad and look like an idiot kinda thing.
...
Even when they make them you just ignore them....Always amusing when some troll comes out asking for what is already there. I wont bother naming off the new IPs from them this gen though. Even if I did you'd be in the next article making the same claims..
That you think they wouldnt just proves you are a first gen gamer.
Let me explain. You are going off of Wii and acting as it its always been this way, which is cool for a first gen gamer but thats not how it has always been.
N64 more poweful than PS1
GC more powerful than PS2.
Its not that he is naive, it's jsut you're clueless and havent got a clue what you are talking about
So copying Nintendo is a strength but Nintendo is weak... LOL typical Sony follower... Yes consoles you know nothing about will offer the latest in cutting edge 3 year old tech and thats just fine cause it carries the Sony name..fanboys are a funny lot.
You havent posted anything to respond rationally to.. In one paragraph you say Nintendo fanboys are bragging about a huge jump in power yet they claim power doesnt matter.yet then you say its nota huge jump in power. Showing exactly why they make those statements. Many devs have said its more powerful than current gen consoles yet "experts" like you already know its inferior to console that havent even been announced yet simply because you need a reason to hate
The power c...
Yes cause only fanboy could look at the senseless moronic comment and think it wrong. You my poor delusional friend obviously do not understand what a fanboy is. Saying the company with the highest rated games this gen and the most sales to back it up, is the worst, is amusing though and obviously only something a fanboy for another company would say.
And you believe this why? You obviously understand very little if you think Wii u will need to be expensive to be more powerful than tech from 2003.
I am sure after that comment you'll also be in the Vita pages telling everyone their just getting ports of PS3 games and trying to convince them it is some how wrong though right?
Oh no just another bias hater who changes their opinion based on company name
So does Wii dude. IN fact it has the highest rated exclusive this gen in SMG..
Funny for all tgheir superior power that PS3 and 360 cant beat Wii when it coems to what really matters, gameplay.
LOL State of the art consoles.... Yes if state of the art is 3 year old tech when it launches...
lol Someones not that knowledgable when it comes to tech in the past few years. Nothing will "Eclipse" the 360 or PS3 at this point.
Even though the difference in graphics between Toy Story and Toy story 2 are immense most people couldnt tell the difference.
We are not in the first or second gen of gaming so those types of leaps in graphics are not going to happen again.
It will be superior and most likely do games at true 1080p 60fps b...
We dont know if PS4 or 360 will be more powerful.. Sony already stated they werent going that route with the PS4 but I am sure you know more about their plans than they do..