What better way to get the consumer interested in your new game than by giving them incentive from making your old games easier to gain access to?
You know what would have been smart? Putting any of the Tales games or Yakuza games on sale to coincide with the release of the newest games in the franchises.
A "Real gamer" would be able to game on the tablet controller and have no issues.
A "real gamer" isn't someone who whines about a controller. They just pick up what is made for it, adapt, and enjoy the games.
@Veneno below - And Microsoft still makes an elite controller
Sony still makes 3-4 different headsets
By your logic, they must know that all their other options are garbage too.
Both of the things you are complaining about does bother quite a few people. But they aren't extremely vocal and up in arms about it because they are still enjoying the game despite that.
I myself hate both of those parts of the game and make no hesitation to speak on it. Hell, I just got a box of nothing but duplicates. But at the end of the day, I do still enjoy playing the game. So I just suck it up, deal with it, and don't buy any of their microtransaction loot ...
They did say that they've known which characters would be LGBT since the beginning. That's true.
But if that was the case, why not have just stated it from the beginning? We know the age, height, and weight of all (or most) characters from the profiles they put on their website so it wouldn't have been hard to add in a "sexual orientation" line or something. So why hide it for so long?
It makes it have the feel that it was something they thought of lat...
The first game back on PS2 was dubbed. I don't know about any of the other ones since that's the only one I ever go around to actually playing so you could be right on that.
The overly serious tone and the drab, dreary city made the first game incredibly boring for me. Only thing in the first game I did like was the privacy invasion things. Seeing what weird or stupid things people were doing was entertaining but nothing else was and that made even what little fun there was boring after a while.
Shifting to a less depressing story and a more uplifting locale was definitely the right move in my eyes.
I'm not playing Watch Dogs for its multiplayer so this has no effect on me.
It doesnt really matter. You're right. And That's kinda the point.
Why now? Why not just have stated whichever characters were gay from the get go? They claim that they've known since making the characters which were LGBT so why not have just added it to the lore somewhere on their site like with all the other information for the characters?
Would still get the argument that it's pandering and what not but to a lesser degree. I know I wouldn't h...
But why though? "Revealing" which characters are gay and which aren't have nothing to do with the game.
It's not like there is any character development from some super dramatic plot or something and it's not going to change how any of the characters play at all so.....why?
If there was ever a need for an example of pandering, here it is.
The article is just about how Sony is doing better than expected, with a quick bashing of Nintendo for hits.
Unless my save files from 360 can be carried over, I'm not buying either of them.
Inability to jump
Missing survivors and psychopaths
Smaller mall
Inability to take pictures
Cannot get the true ending.
Added guns, recycled from Resident Evil 4
It's like two completely different games. So different that DR1 can, and is, considered Xbox exclusive.
Considering that only Dead Rising 2 and the "What if?" alternate version of Dead Rising 2 are the only multiplatform titles in the franchise and Playstation never even got the prequel and sequel standalone DLC/expansions for DR2, I'd honestly be surprised if Dead Rising 4 is multiplatform.
Yeah....$60 is too much when you consider that the game really is just $40 and the other $20 is for 5 ingame skins and 5 other items that you cannot use unless you play other Blizzard games, which all but one are solely on PC.
So if you are only a console gamer, you're paying for content you will never use.
What they SHOULD have done was release the $40 base version for consoles and not the $60 Origins edition.
Origins Edition only makes sense on PC. ...
There's a difference between having to download 50GB vs having to just install 50GB.
If I'm downloading it, there's the risk of hitting a data limit cap (if one has such), slowing the internet down for normal use, and dropping connections altogether and not being able to finish.
If it's just an install, there's no internet anything happening and its much simpler. Just put the disk in and let it go to work. If the internet cuts out on you for whatev...
I'm holding out on getting an Xbox One until either the eventual bundle with Halo 5 next year or the one for the new Gears (whenever that comes out).
Or at least one that I'll keep. Thinking of getting a cheaper, used Xbox One to play until then.
It's weird in a way. Nintendo consoles are never my primary, excluding handhelds, but I always get them and I always have more fun playing what I do get for them than I do with my primary one.
Same here though it will probably be a Xbox One for me. Maybe. Depends on whichever one gets to my '5 games that I want to own, announced or otherwise' minimum first is the one I get. Xbox is closer at the moment with 3 over the PS4's 2.
I use everyone but Winston and Torbjorn on this list.
Sombra, Symmetra, and Zenyatta are practically Mains at this point.