it can't exacrly be called a console exclusive when it's available on 3 platforms. One, 360, and PC.
OMG I JUST TURNED MY THEME FROM BLUE TO RED!!! Seriously, no one gives a flying f*$@k. Sony, please get rid of this stupid OS and multitasking BS and unlock the two CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM that's dedicated to running it for video games. Not sure why people care more about some gayass theme they look at for two seconds before they select what game they want to play, or better yet, the ability to watch OTHER people play games! Haha you guys are all losers that need to get a life other tha...
The main reason it's not scary, among others of course, is because of the stupid checkpoint system. Death means nothing in this game because you can always try again from the last checkpoint which are quite often. Alien: Isolation makes you find save points and if you die it could mean a huge setback. For a game like 'The Evil Within' that's supposed to be focused on death, it sure does a good job of taking it out of the picture for the player.
Ya you're just trolling bro. Both are fun games and both have their place. I'm glad they're different, sometimes I feel like a more simulator experience in BF and sometimes I feel like the arcade-style CoD brings to the table.
Would rather Sony just scrap the OS altogether and go back to PS1/PS2 days where you put the game in and it just ran the game. Also those 2 cores and 4 GB of RAM the OS eats up could be used for games and there would definitely be no reason for any game to run less than 1080p/60 fps.
What? Do you not know anything about computers or are you just trolling? Of course quality is linked directly to power. I guess according to your logic you can get the same quality game on the PS1 as the PS4? How would the PS4 not benefit from freeing up RAM and CPU power to run only the games? At least allow people that don't care about game sharing to turn that crap off and run games at higher settings.
60 fps is not always needed nor always wanted. For sports games or games like CoD yes 60 fps is a much better experience. Movies and TV are both displayed at 24 fps because anything higher looks weird and that's what some of these games are trying to accomplish, a cinema-like experience. Resolution on the other hand is a different story.
No, I don't mind if you use them. I'm not too sure there is much more to these consoles though. Both are based on basic PC architecture with x86 processors unlike the PS3 with the hated Cell and the 360 with a PowerPC processor. Maybe Sony and Microsoft will drop the multitasking and game-sharing stuff and dedicate these CPU's to gaming only which might move the needle, or something like Metal that Apple came out with which would lower the overhead required to run these games, but...
I don't care about 900p if that's all [insert system here] can handle. I only care about it if it can handle more, but is purposely held back "to avoid debates and stuff." Just do the best the system can handle while having smooth gameplay and I'm fine with it. It is disappointing that both the PS4 and Xbone can barely do, if at all, 1080p/60 fps though. That should have been the standard when designing these systems.
How about getting rid of all the sharing and multitasking bulls$#*t and free up more RAM and the CPU to bring higher quality games. I'm tired of this all-in-one crap. The PS4 and Xbox One are a jack of all trades, but a master at none and I'm tired of it. My Apple TV does content better than my consoles and I'm fine with that. Just give me better games.
I wish Sony and Mircosoft would get rid of all the sharing and multitasking BS and open up all 8 cores and 8GB of RAM for gaming only. But I guess people care about stupid crap so until people stop thinking they're going to get famous by "sharing" their gameplay, we'll keep having subpar graphics and gameplay on this generation of consoles.