not used to feeling sick. that's stupid. you get used to what makes you sick, and then you don't get sick.
cuz they don't have the games to go with the power and graphics, maybe.
is this the same guy that wrote sony was doing something dangerous? mike something? if it is, he's clueless and should lose his job. if it's not, this site should take a looong look at who they have writing.
that's prolly why he mentioned the reviews?
you don't give it a bad score just cuz you can't play it. that's stupid.
i don't already own driveclub vr.
why bother commenting if you don't read comments?
you spelled and used infinitely wrong. it took like one generation for sony to match all of nintendo's home console sales. prolly even surpassed it. the only way nintendo sold more is if you add in handhelds. sony sells in places where nintendo isn't even thought about. so, yeah. pretty tiny limb.
not much of a gamer, are you?
pretty sure it was a business decision, and not gamers. but okay.
not sure why all the responses are inappropriate. especially if naruga's comment isn't...
just somebody looking for clicks. they even disabled comments on the article, cuz they know people will call out how stupid it is.
you guys are so sad.
common sense says you should stick to xbox instead of trollin sony, but here you are.
nobody trusts you, fanboy.
getting your butt kicked by the competition is a failure.
xbox doesn't have uncharted, so spencer paid for tomb raider to compete with it.
cuz they're not completely different?
it's not confusing. but it's definitely stupid.
who said xbox literally didn't have any games? you just making that up? if not, show me. how do you know how fast xbox is selling since microsoft won't give any numbers? they said it a long time ago, but even back then the new xbox was already slowing down. that study said 12 minutes difference, and it was a crappy study since you could prolly make up whatever time you wanted. did you get details the website that wrote the article didn't get? no?
you're not ...