I bet your 60 dollars will hurt activision big time
What? First 3 games had multiplayer and they were extreamly popular, stop spreading misinformation
Call of duty 2 was even the most popular xbox live game for some time
Even the ps2 versions of call of duty 1 to 3 had online.
Overwatch is 40 on pc. On consoles its 60 dollars
Yet Rainbow Six Siege is popular
Call of duty ww2 has no p2w microtransactions. Its EA that does these things mostly, yet people now are talking about how "Battlefield will show call of duty how to do it". Well, thats a lot of faith on a series with universally bad campaigns and a publisher that stated the other day that its doubling down on microtransactions even with the belgium ban.
Battlefront 2 came out less than a year ago, how can people have this short a memory
And besides the popular BRs are fortnite, which is shoot and build with wacky weapons and a small map (These are not negatives, i really enjoy it)
And the non cartoony offering is pubg, which is JANKY AS HELL, and there should be a better alternative
This could be it
Exactly, people think the fans are the ones here bashing.
No, they werent going to buy the game regardless of the content
Id say the competitive shooter scene is too crowded at the moment for another paid game, so probably
Unreal is good, Gears is not
I love how making a campaign is "easy" now
Are you talking about rainbow six siege?
Id say its mediocre, not complete garbage
Treyarch doesnt make decisions, they just do what activision says
Cons: The money bag microsoft gave us was heavy
Not really, knack 2 is a budget game that got panned
You say it like its a good thing that microsoft can dissapoint their customers
A true corporate warrior
This is said every year, and every year it sells millions
You didnt even try it yet and you are already knocking it down?
Are you a walking advertisment?
"Lets post my opinion as fact"