CRank: 5Score: 930

Just to be sure, the "All ps3 games are tech demos, all of the great graphics are fake and happen in the background, effects are not full 720p" does not reflect my opinion but are remarks of Cez!

5474d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Just take a look at this guys comment history, nothing more to say.

5475d ago 8 agree1 disagreeView comment

Man you must be one of the most ignorant fanboys out there. I have read some of your comments (UC3, motorstorm 3 etc), you're so pathetic. All ps3 games are tech demos, all of the great graphics are fake and happen in the background, effects are not full 720p etc etc.

Even played GOW 3? Don't think you have. Get a life big man!

5475d ago 10 agree2 disagreeView comment

Care to elaborate on that?!

5489d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

When I read that the environments are horrible just like the textures, with graphics worse than killzone 2, I just stopped reading:-)

5490d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

Did you even read his post? Seems you didn't..

5508d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

Mmm just went through the comparison gallery. Just a shame they don't mention quite a few improvements seen in these pictures with respect to the general lighting and for example the glare effect on lights in the game. No they choose to focus on the two normal maps that are missing and an effect that is less precise (same ex. found in the demo analysis).

5525d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Resistance 3 coming to xbox 360?:)

5562d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Take a look at the eurogamer/digital foundry gallery and video of both console versions. The two games are almost identical. Some slight lightning differences. Some texrture differences, sometimes in favour of PS3 sometimes in favour of xbox360. Adjusting the contrast should bring about some very similar results! Framerate analysis could be a differentiating factor off course.

ht...

Actually, the ps3 version looks better than xbox 360 in many of the screens except the first one. Much closer to the pc version in terms of lightning colour etc. Xbox version doesn't look any better with the super high contrast.

5599d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Is it my eyes or is there some kind of blur effect / depth of field effect going on between 1:24 - 1:28 of the video (in-car gameplay sequence)?? Seems there is some kind of effect going on when he brakes...? Maybe I'm just seeing things I would like to see:-)

5620d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well at least the pictures aren't all that representative of the actual game running or my home screen. Even the PSN pop-up in the fifth screen looks washed. Brightness is way too high compared to the xbox version. No doubt that the game still looks more washed out on PS3 due to the use of QAA.:(

5648d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

They talk about killzone 3 still not having a cover mechanic??? And the action being fast-paced like before? Well cover mechanic was already introduced in killzone 2 and because of this the action was not really run-and-gun at all (I loved killzone 2 for that). That being said, the developers have said that run and gun is more present in this last installment.

5666d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Instead of talking this crap please take the time to actual read a post. These may be bullshots, higher resolution etc. GT5 does the same thing all the time. But trust me, the Dutch magazine that played the final build of the ps3 version, aint talking shit. What does a 1200p image tell you? It doesn't mean shit!

What are you trying to prove?

5683d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

First of all, like many other people said DLC is ps3 only and the triangle button appears on the screen.

More important is the fact that a dutch website has gotten an early look at the final ps3 build and say all the issues (framerate, tearing, aliasing issues) are gone!! Compared to earlier build (all according to the magazine!) the final build is very much improved and looked absolutely great!!

So please stop the "fake/bullshot" crap!

5684d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Everybody here has their opinion ready while not even having played the game. The guys over at cynamite say the ps3 version looked slighty sharper! Xbox supposed to have some better shaders according to the same website. Both are 720P. So what are all those ignorant people here arguing about sub-HD resolutions etc?

5707d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Mmm xbox 360 doesn't seem to have anymore AA applied! Looks slighty blurrier I must say! Did not expect to be saying this but from these screenshots the ps3 version looks to be the more appealing of the two console versions. (actual screentear/framerate not included in the analysis off course) Either way I think (hope) that 2K did a good job on both the console versions.

5707d ago 3 agree4 disagreeView comment

Well I honestly don't think so... looks way to clean and high res to be console gameplay especially after seeing the previous footage on GTTV. BTW it isn't looking bad is it? Still a bad quality video... not sure what people are expecting from crysis? Looks extremely good, however, perhaps design-wise the indoor environment looks a little dull compared to the tropical jungles of the crysis? Effects, smoke, particles etc. all look very high res.

5742d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Yep is not the first time they did this.. Also did it with the first BRINK walkthrough. Developer later admitted that it was all pc gameplay played with the xbox gamepad.

5742d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

To be honest I doubt this is even xbox 360 gameplay... thinking it's pc gameplay played with the xbox 360 gamepad. Looks way cleaner (anti-alliasing) as the footage shown before. Besides, it looks way to high res (also the textures) to be console gameplay.

5742d ago 10 agree13 disagreeView comment