Did not care for the last game,But I have to see it through to the end.
Tomb Raider single player was everything I wanted UC3 to be.I hope ND can up their game for UC4.
Wow I really enjoyed that.
I don't play every single new game that comes out,but I was very happy with Tomb Raider,BioShock,Deadspace,Xcom .My disappointment this year was GOW Assc.I found I a little stale and unnecessary.I'm still looking forward to GOW 4 though.
I'll support GOW from the ending of #3,but I still say there was no need for GOW Asc.Found it boring and tired.Maybe just a cash grab.
There was no need for this game.It was a cash grab.
There was no need for GOW Asc.Just a cash grab.Story was so boring I even forgot what it was from time to time.And I am a huge GOW fan.Just my opinion.
I am a huge UC fan.And I think this Tomb Raider is everything I want UC3 to be.To me to really rocks and I hope ND rises to the challenge.
I have played and enjoyed all the UC games.Just finished Tomb Raider.Thought there were things about it the were a lot better then any of the UCed.Hope ND meets the challenge on their next UC.
I found the story(theme)very adult.Actually made me go and look up some facts on wounded knee and some other subjects that were touched on.I also thought the throwing the ball choice was at a black woman and a gay white man.I thought this because of a emblem the man was wearing.As the Nazi's made them wear during their rule.
I thought the game was great.One thing though.When I talk with my gamer friends.We who are 35 yrs plus.Think the game is work of art.Under 35,not so much.Don't even know if that means anything.Just something I noticed.
I do enjoy the Mulitplayer,but as in most games you'll be able to hear the crickets in about 6 months.
Both consoles will be similar......Duh
April fools you fools
I have a question.Does it cost game developers a lot to add online multiplayer to their games.I don't play much online myself,but I'm think other then games with huge online followings it's a waste of money.Let's use Tomb Raider as a example.Won't most people try the online for a small amount of time then move on to something else.Don't make online for every game and maybe those games would sell for cheaper.Maybe I'm wrong,but I'm just wondering.
Here is the thing and I know I'll get blasted for this.Even though this is a great game.It is not long enough for me to buy.I rented it.I loved the game,but was though it in time to take it back to the store(7days).I rarely play mulitplayer
so It has no real replay value to me.Maybe charge less to players who only play single player and more great games might be sold.
I was paying more for games back in the day(Atari,Intellivision,Coleco vison)then they charge now.The only thing that bothers me a bit is the fact I play mostly single player,but have to pay full price.If gaming goes the way of banning used games I hope one does not have to pay full price if they don't play mulitplayer.
McGee who now mostly works on mobile gaming,says he is more excited about mobile gaming.STOP THE PRESSES !!!!!!!!
Not all games are created equal.There are games I have to own.Then there are games I just want to play.So I rent them.Just like I do for movies.Sometimes I trade a game in towards a new game.I just don't get what the big deal is.I want a new car.I trade in my old one.I can even rent a car if I want.I really don't play Multiplayer all that much.Maybe I should be charged half price for any game I don't use the multiplayer.
I thought ND delivered in UC1 AND 2.Not so much in 3.Can I only pay half price if I don't play multi-player.