psiom

Member
CRank: 5Score: 17950

Dude. What's the big issue? It's cartoon "nudity" built with weapons.

I can tell you right now that Bungie doesn't have a problem with this, because they have a sense of humor (unlike you apparently?).

If they act against it, the orders will almost certainly have come from Microsoft or an ESRB legal requirement.

6421d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

That's not porn, it's artwork.

What kinda messed up paranoid loonies are worried about this as PORN?

It's nothing more than what you'd see in an art gallery.

6421d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

rofl at the physics of winning.

The physics of your posting style is awesome.

6421d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wouldn't 00:05:24:00 mean 5 minutes and 24 seconds? Otherwise it's 5 hours and 24 minutes, and I do doubt just a little that it's that long.

Otherwise, the 5 is just there for decoration? How do they derive 24 minutes from that timecode?

6422d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Or did that video make the gameplay look really crap?

I mean...I know the graphics are awesome, but the gameplay in that little segment looked awful. Zombies kinda lurching around doing nothing while they wait for their 'turn' to attack (like a B grade kung fu flick).

Didn't help that the player/s couldn't AIM.

I'm excited for this game, and I loved RE4. I just hope that this video was for some reason a mere bad example and not a bad sign.

6425d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

For anyone interested, here's the situation:

Every state in Australian, bar ONE, has voted to bring in an R18+ classification for video games. The holdout state (South Australia) is due to a fundamentalist christian nutcase that thinks he's saving the country.

Unfortunately, it only takes one state to oppose the change to derail the whole thing. He's been petitioned for a long time, but he won't budge.

A lack of an R18+ classification in Australia means ...

6439d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

You haven't had a look at the R1 server list have you?

FAIL.

6441d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

I hope this does better on 360 than it did on PS3. I really like the game, but for some reason it's not really a hit at all with PS3 gamers. Hardly anyone around.

It's not like there aren't online PS3 gamers that are into shooters - RFOM and Warhawk are absolutely LOADED with players, as is COD4. Even TF2 (Orange Box) has more players than UT3.

It sucks, because I really like the game. The engine feels great on the PS3, as it surely will on the 360. It's smooth, fun,...

6441d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

This comparison is stupid.

The games are on different platforms, with different install bases, have different gameplay styles, and have nothing whatsoever to do with one another.

Neither one of these two games will affect console sales. Not one bit.

Everyone that's going to buy a 360 because of Gears of War already has. Same goes for R2.

Both will be great games, and come November you really can't lose either way.

You can be a c...

6441d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Actually, the large numbers of people that greatly enjoyed Resistence1 are the people that care about Resistence2. I'm not quite sure how that painfully simle concept escaped you. I guess your irrational PS3 hatred might be the answer? :)

Honestly, you'd have to be an idiot to try and pretend that not many people are looking forward to R2.

6441d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

Resistance1 still has bucketloads of players.

Is it mandatory to constantly pull idiotic drivel out of your arse when you own a 360?

6441d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

Woo...get it out. Feel better?

Just out of curiosity, are you aware that using the term 'fangirl' only serves to dispell any possible remaining doubt that you're just a ranting idiot?

Can you direct me to line in the blog post that says the 360 is dead? I'm not sure you even read it, but you've jumped on the Xbox protection wagon none the less.

Consider this:
The Xbox 360 numbers are not yet in excess of the original Xbox numbers. For the 360 to be...

6441d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

I didn't write it, but I don't have a problem with it.

You'd have to be feeling really defensive about the 360 to honestly take offense by it, or to have any strong feelings at all about it really.

It's a short piece of opinion, to be taken with a grain of salt. Obligatory sensationalist title added for good measure.

I personally don't agree that the 360's glory days are over. That's really far too extreme a thing to say. The gist of the article though i...

6441d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

You 360 cry babies need to chill out.

This is an opinion article that at worst can spark some discussion. I agree that he forgot a few 360 titles, but the main points of the article are simple and pretty much true.

Does the 360 have the same momentum it had at its peak? Not really.

Is the 360's immediate future lineup looking weaker than their brilliant 2007 sweep? Definitely.

It's not even a PS3-vs-360 blog post. It talks more about the Wii...

6441d ago 6 agree3 disagreeView comment

I reckon they probably use Firefox to browse the net in the I.E office. They were probably just as excited about version 3 as anyone else.

6454d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

I was thinking the same thing.

This June 18th 2.36 update is clearly the reason for the incorrect speculations that 2.4 would be on June 18th.

It could be months before 2.4.

They said 2.36 would be soon, and it was. They also said 2.4 would have ingame XMB, but that's it. All they said. No timeframe info for 2.4, which is likely a bad sign.

6455d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

But surely you can see that a 360 fan arbitrarily attacking the PS3 (even though just kidding) in a completely unrelated thread will just fire them up even more?

Adding and inciting more fanboyism around here has to be the worst thing we can do for N4G.

The only way to deal with fanboys is to call them on it in the least fanboy-like tone possible. When they're the only ones posting cretinous drivel there's always that small chance they'll realize how dumb they look. ...

6457d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Way to bring the fanboy BS right into a thread it doesn't belong in.

What PS3 fanboys posting negatively are you talking about? <-- ok you edited that part out.

Why do you have a dig at the PS3 itself in a thread about an Xbox 360 game? I can't imagine how you could possibly sound like a bigger fanboy yourself.

6457d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Right - I don't have evidence. That's correct, but nor do you.

The only thing available is Microsoft's story, and NPD sales figures.

It's an argument of opinion, so of course I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure I'm not ;).

Likewise, you have a differing opinion, but you have absolutely nothing to back that up either.

Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, anybody really - they're all spindoctors running the damage-control hamster wheel 24/7 to keep up...

6547d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

They don't simply use retailer data.

Microsoft secures exclusive games in order to boost the console base as well as get great games sales figures.

the latter half of 2007 was a crescendo of gaming excellence for their platform, yet this apparently had zero influence on forecast? Come on dude, where is your belief coming from? Is it because Microsoft said so?

6547d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment