It depends on how well-designed the bots are, I assume.
If the bots just stand around waiting to be killed, then it's probably not good for the game. If the bots are smart enough to complete objectives and function similarly to a real player, then having bots is probably better than not having bots in a game like this.
There is so much hyperbole and what if's in this article
Supposedly it's doing better than Xbox One, but it's still tracking way behind 360. Factually, Microsoft has averaged about 5,000 consoles a month. Even if they stay at that pace and the console generation last 7 years, that's only 420,000 consoles.
I question who this article is written for or what the goals are for writing this are because there is not a lot of evidence that Seri...
I disagree. Sega's turnaround time since they purchased Atlus has increased dramatically. Many games that might not have even gotten localizations in the past have.
"To be frank, these "Bethesda had PS5 versions that were 80% or 90% done" discussions come off as coping mechanisms for Playstation console loyalists who wanted Starfield on their preferred platform."
If this is the first thing you think about, I think that says more about you than anyone else..
I honestly don't want any multiplayer BS at all regardless of the series. PS4 was one of Sony's best consoles because it was about single player games without micro-transaction B.S.
The last thing I want is another generation of shoehorned in multiplayer or even worse everything just trying to be the next Fortnite.
