Look, not saying that early copies are wrong. It was the arrangement that he was offered that made me agree. Early copies are reserved for media / youtube / special people to the industry - and that's fine.
How similar is this to the first game?
Based or biased?
This reminds me of how Half-Life 2 looked better than doom 3 despite similar texture resolutions. The game sounds great also.
Great game. So much fun! :)
TheRadBrad was also part of a marketing ploy like this I think. He lost a tonne of credibility doing that imo. Glad Bain said no though.
True. It's a new game though - and they'll want to profit from the game.
Better than the new PES?
Absolutely awesome looking game. Console version? I see similarities between this and XCOM.
Part of the reason was how many ways the game could be played.
Mass Effect 3 did this right. Plenty of aggressive / defensive classes for each player.
Great for fans but I question its benefit for everyone else.
Could be, but then COD has always been a popular franchise right? If the changes are really positive as they've been showing why shouldn't the the game succeed?
Hmmm pretty good selection. I see that last Splinter Cell game is there.
IMO they were too ambitious. Bungie achieved much but it felt like the same thing over and over. The Second Coming didn't pitch - that's what happened.
Soooon :)
I will only ever buy DLC if the content is worth the money paid. Forza Motorsport 4 happened to have some great pieces of content like the Porsche Expansion. Outlast had Whistleblower. Ubisoft is becoming a company I'm seriously disliking.
IMO Dark Souls had the best single-multi player campaign around. You could play by yourself or go online and have random encounters that could easily sway against you if you were not cautious. That's what should've been done.
Expectations. That's all.
Not everyone is rich enough to buy and then try :)