PixelGateUk

Contributor
CRank: 22Score: 191760

Ther'es plenty of indie sites and smaller youtubers to checkout

3223d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@thekhurg

err and?

3223d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

THat's why you engage with the reviewer, even more so if its a smaller site. They like to talk about games, so they'll happily talk to the reader...unless its DSP Gaming

3223d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Exclusives always bring in rage, no matter the scores or reviews. It's a lose lose situation, even if the game is top quality. *quietly goes back to surfing shields in Breath of the wild*

3223d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

but having an informed view still matters

3223d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's where the first paragraph comes in, the distrust is there towards main stream for a reason. Can't blame people for questioning

3223d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

No it hasn't. In the words of Trump 'FAKE NEWS!'

3224d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

@edmix

Yeah, but even so. You can write a review and ignore a major element like visuals, animation and audio. It's part of a game's DNA

3225d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

The fact they gave the visuals a 10/10 without ever covering it is kinda odd. Like, it does not even make sense in the context of a review

3225d ago 10 agree5 disagreeView comment

There's no mention of the production value, no comment on voice acting or visuals?

3225d ago 13 agree6 disagreeView comment

Northen England slang and chat, i'm not trying to insult before you start that game pal. There's also points about BF1 and Call of Duty. No Man's Sky isnt multiplayer, so why would it be included?

3225d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

There's plenty there. And I genuinely don't believe you did because you acuse of 'Ubisoft hating' don't show your hand too early lad ;)

3225d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

Another case of reading the title and that's all. Also glossing over the fact the topic is multiplayer games. I guess it's cool to ignore stuff though

3225d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

That's the problem, it doesn't have servers. It's peer-to-peer

3225d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

The post talks about that for an entire section :p

3225d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not at this rate.

3225d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

For Honor and Siege are pretty fresh in terms of approaches, design and mechanics. They just release them with awful servers and a glut of bugs

3225d ago 14 agree8 disagreeView comment

Rainbow Six Siege is pretty damn good to be fair

3225d ago 21 agree5 disagreeView comment

Halo 2 would have still been active if it wasnt for it being trapped on services long gone. As for Bad Company 2, the player base was pretty damn small towards the releases of BF 3/4

3225d ago 8 agree3 disagreeView comment

which is funny given how many 'beta' tests they run

3225d ago 35 agree3 disagreeView comment