Not this sh*t again....they all report sold to retail.
The graphics look better than anything on the ps3 and we know the gameplay is going to be far better than the boring shooters on the ps3...god, resistance bored me to tears.
It took forever from the time they showed that misleading CGI video until they finally showed some real gameplay of Killzone 2.
You are one of the most biased people on this site...who in their right mind would listen to you?....everybody can see for themselves that Halo Reach already looks exceptionally good.
Killzone 2 is overhyped...it looks nowhere close to Crysis and basically looks around as good as Gears of War 2...lighting better, textures worse....anyway, Halo Reach does have amazing textures and if anything they are only going to improve...but they already look amazing and are better than the textures in most competing games like Killzone 2.
Ah ha ha ha...I know...its not even confirmed but ps3 fanboys are too stupid to know the difference.
I just played Uncharted 2 and I had to download another damned update....what the hell is wrong with the ps3?...why so many updates all the time?...and why do they take so damn long compared to the few updates on the 360?
Enjoy your gimped sloppy seconds.
Beta testing?....is that what you droids call getting a gimped version of a game a year later?...ahem Bioshock..*cough cough*.
What are some of you talking about?...GTA4 is one of the highest rated games this generation...Infamous is not....if you like Infamous better that's fine but quit acting like it is a fact. I have both systems and have played through both games...and I really like GTA4 better than Infamous....also, what crack are some of you smoking...Infamous looks kind of crappy...I played the 360 version of GTA4 and I think it looks better in almost every way.
What is so funny?...ODST and Left 4 Dead 2 both got really good scores and sold better than most games on the ps3...so I don't see anything you can laugh at.
And to complete every little thing in Mass Effect 2 would take you 60+ hours...so what is your point?
MGS4 is one of the most graphically overrated games I can think of...the textures were mediocre and geometry often looked really blocky...I honestly don't understand what people see in that game...Assassin's Creed and Resident Evil 5 look a lot better...not to mention Gears of War 2. It is a stupid point anyway...MGS Rising will come out on the 360 and will look better than MGS4 on the PS3...and prove all of this talk wrong.
Uncharted and MGS4 were already surpassed by Gears of War 2...the rest of your post is pure flarp and not even worth discussing.
That is totally false....the 360 and the PS3 are both capable of native 720p and 1080p...in fact, most games on both consoles are 720p....the PS3 actually has more games that run at less than 720p than the 360 does. Disc size really has nothing to do with graphics or the quality of video that you can put on it...it really is only a matter of how MUCH of that high def content you can put on there....you can put HD video on a DVD, you just wouldn't fit as much on there as on a Bluray.
I've had Uncharted 2 crash on me too...and there are a lot of glitches online too...does that make it total crap?
I doubt it....the 360 had sales spikes after price drops too...but the ps3 had its most important price drop and the redesign of the console itself and it had a pretty big boost...but the 360 is bringing a lot to the table in 2010 which will give it some great sales as well...so it is going to be a real battle.
The only two ps3 games that I plan on getting are GOW3 and Heavy Rain...the rest of the games on the ps3 this year look meh to me.
OmarJA-N4G you are a spin doctor...nothing you say is going to take away from the fact that Mass Effect 2 will be a huge success on the 360.
Ok but then the 360 is selling an even higher percentage of software....if there are not really that many 360s out there then why does it sell so much more software than the PS3?