yea but whats the point. theres nothing to do in it or in the game for that matter. all you can do is continue the story mode, theres no sidemissions or diversions
LOL ^^^
well its dissapointing compared to mafia 1. its an open world game and the standards have been set by many other games. to come out with an open world game that takes 11 hours to beat and has no side missions, no multplayer , and nothing to do after you beat the game other than play it again on hard is just not worth the money. just look at all the gta games, just the story mode alone is like 90 missions long and takes AT LEAST 30 hours. mafia 2 was 20 missions and ...
la noire , agent , max payne 3, red dead. all take 2 does is announce games for this year knowing they wont release then silently delay em. all 4 of those games have been delayed for over a year. just watch , la noire and agent arent coming out next year either.
get the game, its gonna POWN!! :D but yea that dlc kinda sucks cause it adds up.
the game was dissapointing. :( all these years for this. it was a good game but come on ... i beat it in 11 hours. mafia 1 >mafia 2
it. for me , fallout 3 was the most immersive rpg ive ever played, i actualy got every achievement and even after that i kept going and went into every building and every area in the map and explored it fully, i put 80-100 hours into it. and i felt it was short lol. you seriously dissapoint me , how do u say this is the same game but slightly diffrent. its in a diffrent world with new people and mission. yea 60$ on a 100+ hour rpg isnt worth the investment huh.. gess youll have more fun on on...
looks like someones butthurt ps3 got jailbroken
i dont understand why this games getting such low scores. mafia 1 was the exact same game, it was a linear game with an open world, no sidemissions and it was all about the story, i loved that game on pc and so did reviewers it got like 90s. now this one comes out and everyones giving it 70s wtf. its the same game but better.
dont feed the troll
why the hell does ps3 have free dlc and not 360?
sounds good to me. ps3 online sucks anyways i might as well just play offline all my backups and use my 360 for online games.
hey im just saying , its my opinion. during the mex part i was like right about to just skip cutscenes cause i really didnt care anymore. i felt like it was dragging on way too much. ur doing all these missions for no reason. the end chapter was cool but what i had a problem with was the actual ending event. havent they learned anything from JRPGs or MGS series. they could of had me tearing up cause it was a good ending but instead they just make it all rushed no music or anything. the moment...
no, the story was so dumb. everything was alright till u get to mexico then it just went into meh. you in mex fighting in the revolution for who knows what reason. then there was also the rushed ending which coulda been so much better if they had putsome music or something. but no , it didnt do anything for me.
ok guys, im not a hater or fanboy but wtf. mgs4 ending wasnt that good. mgs3 ending was the best ending of any video game ever. mgs4 was kinda meh. the only part i thought was sad was when otacon told the little girl how he went away. but when that one character shows up in the end i was like OMG@#@#@#@#!!!! lol
hitman series is awesome it just needs a reboot. 3 and 4 were pretty meh. 1 and 2 were defenetly some of the best games ive ever played.
well they said there was 3 cod titles in the works... so.. yea its going the way of guitar hero.
whats up with all these gears clones? army of two, kane / lynch lol
what are you talking about? SR2 was a good game and awesome with the coop. but the online versus was a piece of SH1T. no big ass chains , no protect the pimp, no pimped out ride.. all we get is 2 lame modes which are mega unbalanced with everyone sprinting like crazy and shotgunning people
jailbreaking iphone was illegal? lol XD
lazy ass devs. lol took them like 5 years to make this game and theres no activities or reason to keep playing after you beat the game.