Actually, there was a beta for World at War.
Has the potential to be a pretty good story.
Don't forget Skrillex as well.
Take the hurt out of your butt, and grow up.
I get the sinking feeling that this will end up being another broken Ubisoft turd.
This is Bungie's trademark secrecy in action. They did it for YEARS with the Halo franchise just to try and build up intrigue and to string the player base along.
DeeJ, is only able to say what the Bungie heads will allow him to say.
People need to calm down about the $130 worth of DLC skins. Valve essentially does the exact same thing with TF2. You don't HAVE to buy any of the skins.
Honestly it wouldn't surprise me. No way is EA going to miss out on the chance to make more money.
If you read the list of charges that are being brought against him, he committed quite a few crimes.
The thing is though, there was very little about the original Homefront's MP that was "CoD-like".
And...ya know...for the servers to actually work at launch. I think it was 3 weeks or a month before they finally got the servers sorted.
Also, will it have better multiplayer than the first game? The MP from the first one had the potential to be pretty good.
Yes, it is an MMO.
If they were going to do it for any of the current Gen console and PC, I'd say give me any of the first 3 Sonic games as well as Sonic & Knuckles.
After BF4, I most definitely won't pre-order, and I may just skip the title all together. I'll just wait and see how the game does post-launch.
Coming from EA, I'll believe it when I see it. Especially after BF4.
I'll believe it when I see it, and after the travesty that was BF4, I definitely will not be pre-ordering this.
How did a trash article like this get approved?
All will be revealed tomorrow. Also Descope is back!
http://www.dualshockers.com...
Personally, I'll have to see more info about multiplayer and Zombies before I make my decision on whether to bite the bullet with this one. As of right now, I don't plan on buying it, but that could change.
On a side note: Am I the only one that thought this article was trying way too hard to sound overly intelligent, and was wordy for the sake of being wordy?