Not sure what you've been reading (especially on this site) but its just been nothing but negative about this. Not really sure why actually, so what if its not for everyone. And just because its not for the masses doesn't mean it needs to fail, people on this site are so negative about everything that might be a little different. Stadia might not be ideal (I know I wont be getting it) but its stuff like this that push tech and innovation, it can lead to other companies trying to ke...
Why is it that you cant trust this just because its a good review? If it was a bad review you'd then be happy?
I love how if it gets a good review they are paid off..... you people are so jaded.
How is this preventing anyone from buying a physical copy? This is only to prevent people who acquired it before release date from playing. It's no different for digital version either, as you're allowed to pre download it, but you cant actually play it till its released. Lets not be so dramatic.
How is this proof that disc games are dying? All this is, is to prevent people that got their hands on a physical copy from playing before others. This is all it is, and nothing new to be honest with you.
"the gay lifestyle", like its a choice they make......
No, it doesn't. Being gay is not a choice, not a decision someone makes. Your wording of perverse would imply that being gay is a deliberate decision that is in some way "wrong", and that just isn't the case.
Died? Lol, Pokemon Go is still the most played phone game out there, and this is almost 3 years later.
Really unsure why you would want any game to tank hard. That is just really bad for the industry as a whole.
Seems silly that you wouldn't buy a game because its on battle.net and not steam. I mean how in any way is it an inconvenience that its on bnet?
They can still charge the same amount. You're still getting a ton of content, just with no single player stuff, which with a shooter is often terrible to begin with (ie. CoD franchise). So why not forgo the time spent in making a half baked single player experience and put all your effort into the multiplayer experience?
A ton of people only play shooters online, so this makes complete sense.
It's perfectly fine that it is multiplayer only. They are not claiming it to be anything other then that. Obviously if people want a single player campaign with their game, then they know to stay away from this title. There have been many games that are multiplayer only that have been very fun and popular, from Warhawk to Counter Strike, to Team Fortress 2. This is nothing new.
Just because a game is'nt targeted for your particular interests doesn't make it wr...
More then one city :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...
You can watch the video on mute........
Who knows, maybe if modding gets approved/takes off with fallout, that might open the door to other games getting mods on the PS4.
I wouldn't be so sure of that. While I do agree with you that Konami is probably behind the micro transactions, don't forget that Kojima did put out Ground Zeroes, and that was pretty damn short for the price that it was. And with that past I wouldn't put it past him either.
I just wouldn't be so quick to judgement.
Try trolling a little harder, that preview video looked nothing like Fallout New Vegas, never mind Fallout 3. Open your eyes.
It is Boston, Paul Revere statue, and it looks like the U.S.S. Constitution was shown too. SOOOOOOOOOO amped for this, wow.
It's not a bad thing to get the hype up for the big E3 announcement, and two weeks out is pretty good timing to do that. In my opinion.
It is a direct relation to gaming power. Oh the irony with your comment......