When you look at the gameplay. Gears Of War 1 & 2, completely owns Killzone 2, and what is more important? Gameplay or graphics? GAMEPLAY.
5. Bully
4. God Of War II
3. Ico
2. Resident Evil 4
1. MGS3: Snake Eater.
Monotonous levels that merely throw hundreds of the same generic enemies at you prove that bigger isn't always better. The enemies and setting are very repetitive. Very little multi-player objective or mode variety. Co-op's extremely large enemy forces noticeably slows down the pace of combat.
I don't know why this game got such a high score on metacritic. In my honest opinion, it should be 60%. It pisses me so much off, that these average at best FPS like Resistance 2, Killzone ...
Uncharted 2 > God Of War III > Killzone 2.
Send me a message and I will reply. I have a PS3, and I can pop in some of my games like Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Motorstorm, Resistance, Littlebigplanet and MGS4 for you for proof that I'm a happy PS3 owner. I have played the Killzone 2 demo as I said, and I think the graphics are amazing. But it is not fun.
You are saying that I can't yet tell my opinion of the game, because I haven't played the whole thing. But PS3 fanboys are yelling KILLZONE 2 IS BETTER THAN GEARS 2, BUT ...
This is coming from a proud PS3 owner. You idiots that are bashing GOW2 have not probably played it.
GOW2 has a cover system that works very well, varied levels and objectives, good graphics, great weapons and enemies, and horde mode which is really fun. There, you can't disagree with me, because I backed up my statements with arguments. Gears 2 deserved a 9+ score in my opinion.
I deleted the Killzone 2 demo after my second playthrough. It is unbelievable hard to ai...
Bullshit. I find RE5 fun, unlike Killzone 2. Killzone 2 has just great graphics, that about it. I played the demo of Killzone 2. I really tried to like the game, but it was just letting me down.
Snatcher got a 55/100 from a magazine, and that game was a masterpiece.
Shenmue got a 60/100 from a magazine, yet another masterpiece.
Even MGS4 got a 60/100 from a site called poweredupgamers.
Every game gets unfair ratings. That is how life is, deal with it.
It's just a review. 7/10 is not bad either.
Is a great game, because of the very good story, voice-acting and the soundtracks. Gameplay and Graphics are solid.
It was delayed, so that it wouldn't get squashed by other titles hitting in February, like Killzone 2. They want to release it in April, because it is not one single good title that is going to get released in April. I still think The Godfather 2 will suck.
Please, let it be it.
One of the most epic titles in gaming history. It's a shame the failure of the Sega-CD overshadowed the amazing quality of this game.
Kojima is done with Metal Gear, and what a revival it was. Now it's time for the rebirth of Snatcher!
Tomb Raider, Prince Of Persia, Project Gotham Racing and Grand Theft Auto.
Like people care about Metacritic's user score. Those who do it are really pathetic. Why waste so much time on something that nobody really cares about? You can't never trust user scores, because many who give their ratings, are fanboys and hate the console or the game.
That is why Snatcher, Metal Gear Solid and Grim Fandango is my favorite games. Snatcher had little gameplay, but the story was phenomenal. I can't stop thinking of it, and the voice-acting is so well done. I got really into the story.
Games like Halo is fun. But I did not get the awesome feeling I did with Snatcher and other games, because Halo did not have such a good story. The first time I played Snatcher I was like ''What is going to happen now'', and I get that fear inside o...
I'm sorry to all of you. I have anger issues, and I sometime easy can get angry and post bad things. It will never happen again, I promise. Take my bubbles for punishment.
Comment has been deleted.
And you know what the funny part is? IT WAS RELEASED ON CHRISTMAS, and IT WAS THE FIRST NEXT-GEN CONSOLE.