you should have read my comment above before talkin trash.
you're just like what i said, one of those idiots that constantly has to rant about his system of choice is better...despite the fact that you are clearly ignorant on the subject. especially with regards to the facebook thing.
yes, browsers can view facebook. but what MS and facebook are doing is incorporating them together so that they go hand in hand. you can have it so your facebook updates as your xbox...
ugg
why is it any time anyone says anything even semi critical of ps3, there's always someone who comes up with the ever-brilliant "you don't have a ps3 do you?"
i DO have a ps3 and i completely agree. it was cool when i first got my ps3 to be like "oh cool, a built in browser." but, then i realized the browser just had a lot of problems. now, if you're like the guy above that doesn't have a pc, it's great that sony packaged that in there. but if you have a pc...
it's proven...not proved. and OJ was "proved" innocent too. you defend him?
but MJ settled out of court for multiple millions of dollars more than once before this one case actually went to trial.
not saying he is 100% guilty, but the chips were definitely stacked against him. and, it's far more likely he got off, not because his over priced lawyers presented a great case, but because of who MJ used to be.
EDIT: and if all you need to do to...
just because a heavily edited jury found him not guilty one time doesn't mean the charges were false. if he was as innocent as you believe, why'd he settle the first couple out of court for MILLIONS?
and while i agree that ppl are just jumping on the "michael is dead" bandwagon, i disagree that he deserves any of it. the guy has been ruining his body and has basically gone crazy over the last 2 decades. and all the evidence from the autopsies points to suicide. the ...
his death wasn't tragic. his life was tragic. and he brought a good portion of it on himself.
i'm tired of hearing about this guy.
i really doubt we'll see the retail release this year. i hope we do, but if i know blizzard, we're probably looking at Feb 2010 at the earliest.
in SC 1 if you try to play with another person on your LAN on battle.net, you can't. most lame feature ever. i don't need to play ON my LAN (though i see why others would want it), but if i wanna play with a friend at my place or a room mate, i should be able to do it over battle.net without issue.
not sure why you are getting disagrees. must be the fanboys. i for one prefer my 360 to my ps3. but i definitely prefer my PC to both of em. haven't made up my mind about what i'm going to get this on though. i bought a wired 360 controller so i can play 3rd person titles on my PC comfortably, but...i've always played Splinter Cell games on my Xbox n 360. and, if it's anything like assassin's creed, it'll just be a port to PC, not actually built for it, so it won't look much better (if ...
you're crazy.
FarCry 2 was a game i really wanted to test out to make sure my PC gaming experience was worth the expense.
My friend, at the time, had a crappy lap top that couldn't play any games so he got farcry for ps3. i had him bring it over while i ran it on my PC. even when i turned the settings below what i would say is about medium, there was still a pretty noticeable difference in quality. The pc version still had a better draw distance and the plants, up...
disrespectful???
this is a guy, that up to yesterday we all hated for being a pedophile. now he's dead and everyone jumps on the bandwagon of loving him again? such sheep.
just cuz he died doesn't mean you suddenly have to respect him. This guy was a crazy pill popping wine-o that touched children!!! he named one of his kids 'Blanket' for crying out loud. he probably ODed on drugs n alcohol that caused his heart to stop and put him in a coma, AND he needed to di...
the game was bad???
this game was really fun. yes, the graphics were bad. but so were the graphics in infamous and everyone praised that boring game.
i really don't get the mentality of gamers anymore. maybe i'm just getting old. but when it comes to fun in gaming, i want over the top action if i can't have story. and since this game and infamous provide some of the most mind numbing dialogue and worthless comic book wannabe stories, all that is left is the acti...
Official Xbox Magazine says Live is better.
In other news...
Nintendo Power says Wii is still for the hardcore.
In other news...
Give me a break.
Speak for yourself, my friend.
I don't take the time to master most games; but i can safely say, in my prime, i could have held my own again the koreans in SC.
you really believe that?
you think that if they were just milking the franchise they'd come out and say "we're just milking the franchise" ??
you think they would, in any way, criticize their own product?
and i never said that their campaign would be better with co op the way that it is. i implied that they don't have the interest in making the effort to do it because ppl are going to buy it anyway and defend them no matter what--like you i'd ...
I call BS.
You'd think after a COD every 11 months, we could get ONE that actually has a story that incorporates 2-4 ppl.
They are just making excuses for them milking this franchise. same thing over and over. single player story, multiplayer online, slightly touched up graphics engine. i guess i should mention the zombie mode, but...meh. i'd rather play L4D or Horde Mode
whomever got paid the millions of dollars it took to promote a buncha over hyped gimmicky toys and sequels.
this is the best summary of E3 i've seen yet: http://www.escapistmagazine...
i don't see how ppl get so worked up about cheap entertainment. they are just video games. people care more about pointless garbage than they do about the things that actually matter.
videos like these remind me of how embarrassed i am for most of the members of our society.
Well, at least this is more newsworthy than most of the crap we get on this site.
exactly why tattoos are completely moronic. in hindsight, you almost always wish you would have gone with something else. and 10 years down the road none of his tattoos will mean anything.
never understood why ppl felt that they needed to identify themselves through permanently scarring their bodies.
oh well...not my skin.