If you limit yourself to a single console, you are cheating yourself

No_Limit

Contributor
CRank: 7Score: 54950

One of my most trusted reviewing sources is Gameinformer as expected, a great review and score.

Just add another great review to the Metacritic list.

37 reviews, 36 positive, 1 mixed, and NO negative.

4368d ago 27 agree8 disagreeView comment

From the article:

He was also asked when the Xbox One version will be patched to a higher resolution, but his answer wasn’t exactly encouraging for pixel counters.

"Maybe never. Working on improving performance alongside. We’ll see how it goes…"

Yet, he didn’t exclude the possibility, saying that resolution and framerate aren’t mutually exclusive, but priorities are elsewhere:

"The 2 arent always mutually exclu...

4368d ago 23 agree26 disagreeView comment

Somebody is mad that Titanfall scores .6 points higher than the game on your avatar. :)

4368d ago 4 agree5 disagreeView comment

Well said! But this is N4G and I am pretty sure this thread will be 1000 degree in a few hours.

4368d ago 9 agree6 disagreeView comment

Another great score.

So far this game on Metacritic is:

Positive: 35 out of 36
Mixed: 1 out of 36
Negative: 0

Nice!!!

4368d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

So true..thanks for pointing that out. It is pure comedy at its best here when it comes to XB and PS. I have never seen so many quick responses to say that their PS4 is working online right after the news got approved. LOL

4368d ago 5 agree7 disagreeView comment

I know right, all the low Metricritic user scores are like it is 792p and it is just COD with Mech...yad.yada.yada.

Here is an example of a negative 1 user score:

VinceZamgaylord
Mar 12, 2014

"I played the beta and was hoping for better resolution like they said the full game will have but nooooooooooooooooooo. They lied to us and told us the final version will have 1080p and look now. The game runs at 792p with frame-rate drops ...

4368d ago 11 agree10 disagreeView comment

I took back everything I said about Dualshockers, you guys are the best. ;-). Game is universally acclaimed except for a bunch of "0" users' reviews at Metricritic and we all know who they are.

4368d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

What, what about poor gamers with no internet access? J/K :).

Patch is good as it allows developers to fix issue as they go all through the generation and since these new consoles have background download capability, it should be pretty much seamless.

4368d ago 3 agree8 disagreeView comment

Not a problem really, I installed my 1.5tb internal HDD on my PS4 and guess what, only certain model with the right height fits so just research a bit and see which external HDD works and there you go.

He also said this in the article:
“Besides that, you should be fine with off-the-shelf brand name drives. Until we have more details to share, I can’t get more specific. Hope that helps!”

vvvvvvv
As expected, the haters didn't read the memo ju...

4368d ago 6 agree4 disagreeView comment

I'll believe it when I see it. They said KZ MP was 1080p and 60fps on multiplayer when it is far away from it and the The Order: 1886 was said to maxed out the PS4 and it is only 30fps and with black borders.

Hopefully it is true because it will be great for future games on my PS4 but I take anything that developers said (both PS4 and XB1) with a grain of salt until I see them.

4368d ago 4 agree9 disagreeView comment

The Xbox One and Titanfall is save in my entertainment system. That is all.

4368d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wait a minute, if this game wasn't exclusive to MS and is also available on the PS4 at launch, will Sony also be known as marketing geniuses because you also now need PSN+ to play online on the PS4 as well? Just curious.

4368d ago 15 agree10 disagreeView comment

Well said and makes too much sense for this thread.

4369d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

Haven't bought a COD game since COD2. Bought MGSV on launch day though. Huge fan of the series. ;-)

4369d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Source: Digital Foundry
"the lowest recorded result on PS3 is 14fps (during a barrage of bomb explosions), while the 20fps mark is the lowest on 360 (while passing through a fogged doorway)."

"There's no doubt the 360 version gives the smoother experience overall though, with an average advantage of 10fps during gameplay and cut-scene"

Sorry, I'll take a 10fps advantage over screen tearing every time. Maybe it is just me.

4369d ago 2 agree5 disagreeView comment

Nice numbers for both!!

4369d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

Sorry not buying a demo version of the full game for $30 bucks or even $20 bucks for that matter. Going to have to pass on this one. With games now in the 20gb-40gb territory, 3.8gb is going to be a very short and small game.

4369d ago 4 agree16 disagreeView comment

WOW, some of the comments from destuctoid for the review is just crazy man, it is worst than other rapid fanboy sites.

I'll give it a 9/10, it is just my opinion but it it s the first must-have game this year on next gen.

4369d ago 12 agree30 disagreeView comment

It looks pretty much the same to me but head over to the digital foundry performance analysis and the XB360 version has the better framerate, which is more important, and I am glad I got the X360 version. Always getting the best version if you are a multiplat owner.

4369d ago 1 agree10 disagreeView comment