so would i pick it up on ps3? no, i already played the game, but if you havent played it then i would, it is a good single player game, i never played the mp, i play gears for that. but all in all, i wouldent take most peoples word for it from this site, try it for yourself. and i would hate to say it, but most 360 owners are probly saying its a bad game because its now going to the ps3, just look at the reveiws for it, they were pretty good
thanks, i try to make sense
i knew this game would be good, but i didnt expect it to have a hostile takeover in the game industry, good to see it getting the credit that it deserves, great game.
is when people bring up the whole "there is more people with a 360 than a ps3, so devs will make things better or just as good on the 360" its stupid to say that. what happened last gen when the ps2 came out late? it did poor for about a year and a half, then there was no stopping it and at 115 million+ sold, its still running strong, so its very hard for me to doubt sony in any situation they find themselves in when it comes to the gaming biz, i may have gone a little of subject bu...
sh1t, it goes all the way back to the glory days of nintendo and sega, its what helps move the video game buisbess foward and provide us (the consumer) with the best stuff we can get.
paramount wouldent make $150 mill of selling blu-ray in 18 months, and here you have the very desperate toshiba who needs somthing at this point willing to pay that for 18 months of exclusive hd-dvd titles, its perfect logic
thats pretty cool, good idea to use it as a backround even though the idea for the gamercard was stolen from the 360, but hey, if companies didnt copy ideas in the video game biz it wouldent grow as fast as it has
but as a consumer you cant be upset at a company for talking $150 million, after all this is a buisness. plus i think ill be ok without seeing shrek on blu-ray, spiderman and pirates are enough for my veiwing pleasure
i was talking about pimpdaddy, he looks like a pedo for sure. and im anything but an xbot fan, i hate ms, there nothing but a company that will rip people off as much as they can to make a profit, only reason i own a 360 is because of gears.
a pedo. but anyway thanks for your very biased opinion on this, but i would suggest actualy knowing what you talk about before typing stuff over the web, if you just talk to talk, im sure theres a wall around
this generation anyway, and denmark is an important part of that, more than most would think. but i for one beleive that whoever does gain market share this gen will only be the leady by maybe 6% or so. there will never be a console as dominant as the ps2. so i think we can all look foward to good games on the ps3 and 360 for years to come. as for the wii, as fun as it is, i give it another year before they run out of inovative games and the console is finished, not that it matters to nintend...
"It surely does look good, but Bioshock beats this one easily what comes to atmosphere and mood and storyline."
lol, better storyline? so will tell all of us what the storyline in killzone 2 is? besides killing hellgahst i dont think a story line has been announced yet. and your judging the atmosphere of the game on 1 demo level. cant we just wait for the game to come out or for a demo to be released for download before its compared to other games.
how do u thinks games like mgs4 that already take up around 40gigs will stay on 1 disc
the dvd9 is actualy 8.92 gigs :)
instead of trying to defend the reason. just look at 9 gigs compared to 50gigs, then ask yourself, what one can handle more data than the other
what the 360 at now, somthing like 46%?
prove that the 360 is better for next gen gaming? when uncharted, killzone and heavenly sword come out and look better than the 360 games is his statment still clear? you cant judge a console with new tech that is hard to develop for to a console with standard tech that is easy to develop for in a year, not eveb a year, like 9 months or so.
besides your opinion? i mean what do you tealy know about the hardware of either one of the consoles, besides naming a few specs you can look up online. please educate us all on the 360 and ps3, explain your comment.
and i know this will be a fanboy like statment to some of you, any game done now or coming in the future on the 360 can be done on the ps3. now when you look at the specs of each system and actualy understand how the cell + rsx work, you will know that in the coming years it will be the games on the ps3 that cant be done on the 360. the 360 is just easy to develop for at the moment, its not hard to understand and upgraded ps2. on the otherhand the cell processor in the ps3 is still very compl...
sony was down the first year of the ps1 and the first 2 years for the ps2, and look what happened, so it is very hard for me to doubt sony at this point in time. i realy think they do have a well thought out plan even if we may not see it yet. how do you bet against a company who has sold over 200million consoles combined