I honestly liked FFXV, but I don't like all of this DLC that goes back and tells stories that should have just been in the game in the first place. The background knowledge is nice, but it would have made the characters more relatable if I learned it while I was actually playing the game and not a year or two later.
Then stop making every single-player game a giant open world and just create good stories...
I personally disliked the old combat system. Not necessarily the fighting itself, but it was counter-intuitive to evolve your creatures because they had to start out at level 1 again. This created way too much unnecessary grinding that wasn't fun at all. Most of the time you had to stagger your evolutions and gimp yourself with a low level creature in late game stages so you could progress. No other game punishes you for trying to progress like this.
ITT: a bunch of games no one expected to be any good.
This just makes me think of that Southpark Christmas episode.
Thousands of angry customers vs 1 writer who had barely been at the company a year and has a horrid reputation. Which is more valuable?
You act rude to one customer at McDonald's and you'll get fired. The choice seems pretty easy to me.
It's not really misrepresentation as her initially statement has no bearing on what transpired afterward. However, it's also easily accessible from the Twitter links provided in the article (one of them has her retweeting her own tweet that you posted).
I initially was as well, especially from a site call 'God is a Geek,' but apparently it's about battling depression, which at best could be very meaningful to some people and at worst neutral if you've never suffered from depression.
Horizon Zero Dawn didn't have 'Native' people because it was set in the future where there was no such thing. Technically everyone was a 'native' and it doesn't matter what skin color, or other features, they had. All the actual 'indigenous' people were already well dead by that point.
That's like being mad about a game set on another planet where everyone has blue skin. 'But where are the black people, Latinos, or asians?' Maybe....
I feel like extending the 'game experience' could actually hurt profits rather than help them. I'm still trying to power my way through single-player games from last year due to all the extra DLC and online components I want to try out. I never buy anything at retail price anymore because I don't have time to keep up with the content that comes out. By the time I'm ready to buy the next big game, it's 6 months old and $30. Then when they try to milk that $15-30 DLC, I&...
It's more like they're copying Overwatch. Paragon has out of game progression, but in heroes 2.0 everything will be cosmetic. There won't even be talents or limits based on hero level.
Isn't there some rule on here where the image is supposed to be related to the game/topic? It's bad enough that this is a 100% clickbait article, but the image is one frame away from porn and has nothing to do with Overwatch.
You'd be surprised how few people actually understand the process that made F2P and P2W so popular. Mainly the generation of gamers that grew up with free-to-play.
Maybe you should start doing the same thing with your articles if you're going to report other people. Don't be a troll.
Exactly this. I would have paid $20-30. It was fun at E3, but I've heard it's very short. I'll probably still grab it on a Steam sale.
The problem is that's what makes money, and no smart company is going to turn down profit.
I'll agree, it's definitely a beautiful game.
The writing in this article though...
I would play them as they become available in the main story.