By linking to a place where you could download something which hacks into and rips Blu-ray discs?
Like all these 'screenshot comparisions'. THis one is another lame one. Some state ps3 looks better, and others state xbox 360 looks better. They are the exact same, got the exact same scores cross the board, and this is just another attempt at a flamewar.
nevermind
I didn't expect sony to announce god of war 3. I'm waiting for the trailer.
I reported this lame, because I thought it was about RROD, if it was about customer service I apologize.
http://www.totalvideogames....
Can we please now lock it, Kim Naroz isn't anyone except someone grabbing false rumours from years past.
If the ps3 game gets .2, .1, or anything lower then the xbox 360 counterpart, there is this whole discussion of irrelevancy. It is pathetic that there is a fanboy war between xbox 360 fanboys, and ps3 fanboys.
Hoenstly? This game looks great on both consoles, who cares which one has little details making it superior then the other console? I feel like this is just like the darkness, r6v, and graw comparision which were so miniscule difference but, since there was a difference they lower the score by .1, or .2. I feel like it is outrageous seeing how both are nearly identical always
Because it would be massive flamewars, and a multiplat game will get attention. Now this game will probably not get as much attention as the sequel to lair.
Same, I was expecting the ps3/xbox 360 version to be reviewed
I'm guessing xbox 360 fans will argue that their consoles 'expectations' are higher and that their version is more superior. And ps3 fans will argue that the site is biased, and they have the superior version.
I agree.
As easy as that. The reason why lair didn't sell is because it sucked. RFOM has shipped 4 million, and motorstorm 3 million. Those games sold significantly well. It is unbelievable to say that ps3 owners don't want to buy games because "Lair" didn't sell well.
It looks decent graphically, gameplay wise the same guns except now there is "nectar". It isn't cod4 which is all about graphics, rfom "which had awesome weapons", bioshock "with the great horror story, and art design", or have the halo name. It is going to get a 6's and 7's.
Forza 2, GRAW 1, OBLivion, R6v, Gears of war, COD2, Halo 3, and Bioshock. THese all could be deemed "AAA" titles, most of them if not all of them had that "retarded 6, and 7", and the majority of the reviews were 9's. Similar to RFOM, R&C, R6V, Oblivion, and Ninja Gaiden Sigma on ps3.
I can't play this game anymore, it sucks. Because games tm and gamespot gave it a score lower then 8 because it didn't "While games like "Twilight Princess" entice players with familiar settings and gameplay elements, Tools Of Destruction force feeds them. [Dec 2007, p.104] " and had "too much variety".
This is the worst looking next generation game. It is so terrible that it could be easily deemed as a n64 game.
But the discs cost more. There is no reason, logically why some companies will choose a more expensive disc cost (hd-dvd costs around 5 cents more per a disc), and a smaller amount of owners compared to blu-ray owners is the reason why blu-ray wins. Regardless of the cost for a 'blu ray player'. Betamax was worse for having more expensive discs.
Is worse then the review.
lack of faces all togethers, jaggies, and lack of detail. This is one of the worst pics of this game, and it comes out for celebrating this game going gold? Why did you pick this picture bioware, instead of a good picture?