Some of those look kind of cool.
How can it be a copy if theirs somethings missing? One has trees and the other doesn't and theirs more things. So I don't think you can really call it a copy.
If Sony would be worry about COD being on Microsofts system only, why don't they make the add ons come to PS3 first? Because it isn't a big deal and they aren't worry.
You are just trolling, plus whats the point of spending that much money on making it only for your system. The real money is having it on the other consoles.
If they really said that, thats pretty big talk from Nintendo. But I think we all know Microsoft and Sony are going to make something more powerful then the Wii U.
I already got this game for my PS3, it came out as a mimi game and it didn't really cost much (like $2.99 or something). So I'll stick with it.
May not be the best looking model, but if it hits the right price make. I think this could sell like crazy, be cool to see a price $149.99 (most likely won't, but be nice).
Remember, good parents leave their credit cards on their kids systems.
-_- wow can't believe how dumb parents are.
A real leap would be wearing some glasses that put me into the game and I control it with my mind.
But that is asking for to much, heck my mom seen a video of Forza 4 once and she was thinking it was real life XD. Don't know, I want a system to come with a SSD hard drive and thats about it for what I want besides awesome games.
Free to play is good, but free to use what should be free is better (hint Microsoft).
They can't really say much because they haven't push any of the systems, maybe after they bring a game out that pushes the 360 and PS3. Maybe then they can say this (if the game is good).
Unlike PC's, you don't have to upgrade them for any game. So they cost alot less in the long run.
You mean naughty dog, because they were the ones that sold it. Not Sony.
I was so bored one time, I mod my file for PS3 and had a character hold up to 18,000 items.
An this matters how? I been playing the dlc for Skyrim and it seems it open up at more problems with the game, plus why does it matter that a system has more stuff to download then the other?
I most use my 360 for 360 only titles, where my PS3 is use for pretty much everything (mostly because of how big of a hard drive my PS3 has).
I will buy this because Budokai was ok, but they better make Tenkaichi HD.
Now with 200 fighters!!!!
Street Fighter Vs DragonBall Z, A Elder Scroll game that plays like DBZ (meaning being able to shot fireballs fast and have two magic spells crash together).
With out a mod.
So Nintendo is hoping that this is true? Because if it isn't, then they could be screwed.
Did Sony say they won't make a new system until it can make a big leap in graphical? I see the PS4 looking better then Wii U, I mean so far PS3 games look better then the one on Wii U (talking about the Batman AC Vs).
But we would have to wait to see, we don't fully know what the specs are for 720 and PS4 are yet (and yeah I know some of you will say you know...
I would buy one just for the bigger screen, I had to sell my 3DS. So this makes it nice that the screen is bigger.
Microsoft does this, but yeah the same game over and over is pretty mess up. SF4, Super SF4, Super SF4 A.E. and so on.
It gets pretty old, plus when they pull the cr@p of saying "this character won't be dlc and only come with the new game called Super Ult. MvsC3". (Just made up the name to make a point).