Go do a search on best companies to work for and MS will be close to the top, if not on the top. Also do some research on the benefits and perks MS employees get. The MS campus is crazy it has its own gym and shopping center for employees and much more.
I hope they can finally make it so grass doesn't disappear at a distance. That always pissed me off. Though it is funny to see someone crawling on a hillside thinking the grass is actually hiding them.
GRAW is really Ghost Recon 3 with Advance Warfighter tacked on the title. GRAW 2 is what normally would of been an expansion.
Don't worry ape every other GR is when its upgraded its always been that way. That's why its been over two years since the last one.
GR1/GR1 Island Thunder
GR2/GR2 Summit Strike
GRAW1/GRAW2
I don't think it'll change much in terms of game-play on the multi-player side, GR fans are like Socom fans, to much change will piss them off.
1.11 Just what we need 256 players camping around corners. FPS all the way.
As long as it has co-op. I'm happy.
Some of the PSN and XBLA games could easily be made for handhelds instead and sold $30 or more.
1.5 That's not true, I direct connect my consoles and have anywhere from 12 mbps to 24 mbps depending where I'm connecting to in the US. I still have slow downloads on PSN most of the time. A 250mb update on PSN can take longer to download than a 1.5gig demo on Live for me.
I think it has more to do with the amount of activity on PSN and how far from the servers you are. I live about 60 miles from the Live servers and can download something that's over a gig in a 5-10 min, the ...
You've always been able to play all four campaigns in co-op. The new versus maps are just the old ones added for versus.
2.1 that explains alot.
I don't see why people criticize MS for focusing on third party support when last gen they were criticized for not having enough. I remember MS coming into this gen stating that its goal was to gain more third party support. And they've done a great job at accomplishing what they couldn't last gen.
Theirs a lot more third party devs than first party and having their support is just as important.
What are you supposed to do when your asked questions about your competition?
If you take the art direction into consideration Halo is actually an amazing looking game. I think people just expect FPSs to look realistic.
FFVII had a demo. It took place close to the beginning of the game and let you use a few abilities that you normally wouldn't have at the beginning. It didn't have any of the story in it. The demo is really just to show people how the battle system works.
I want the demo just as bad as everyone else, but this article is all assomption.
Why doesn't someone just release a 360 controller with a PS d-pad for both consoles. That would be the perfect controller imo.
I want it but $67.00 is to much for a movie I already have and a demo. Its still tempting though. Is there anywhere to get it cheaper than Play Asia?
Or maybe its the people that own one and enjoy it like myself.
Checking my Live friends list is the only use I've found for the PS3 browser. Its to slow compared to my laptop to do any more. I wouldn't mind one on the 360 so I could do the same with the PSN site.
That's some of the worst logic I've heard on this site, that says a lot.
As for the exclusiveness of the demo, XBLA demos always release when the game releases its a requirement on Live. On PSN devs are free to release a demo whenever they want weather its before or after the game releases or not at all.