The difference is you actually get value back
Halo: One of only a few games to own a 360
So you care more about sales than games???
OT: No reason to own a 360 if you have a good PC. It should be PC versus PS3.
hmmm....$50 and its been 5 years so $150 there is a Kinect joke in there somewhere but I'm not funny enough to find it
yeah you can get on the PC so it's not exclusive, but it does look good
What lag for Sony, those were the games not Sony. The developers have to fix that. Sorcery proves that.
Some person put this together because they felt bad with the other article that came out stating actual plausible reasons trophies were better, nice try though
Yeah he or she didn't do any research just states something out of thin air, makes me question his or hers other statements. Wow at the approvals to articles with no research.
Edit: You know it's funny I haven't seen an article that actually disputes the Sony copied Nintendo on motion controls, why is that?
"I shake my head whenever people still
refer to the 360 as a last-gen console."
Umm it uses last gen technology?????? DVD, is that new or something???
Disc tray instead of slot loading, the Wii even uses slot loading?!?!?!?
No HDMI ports when it came out MS saying they didn't need it, they added it wayyyy later because they called their machine next gen they had to put something in it to justify that statement
I still don't understand why people say there was no problem with FF13 going multiplat when they said they had to cut out so many things.
Okay FF13 was multiplat so there is an excuse right it was SE's fault because they had to divide between the systems, so what is your excuse for Alan Wake? That was to be open world but why was that cut? Why? That had the 360 console only in mind only. Face it the 360 neutered itself right from the get go for not putting in HD-D...
"If Microsoft's goal is to have the 360 at the centre of people's lives then fine"
That is their goal when the first got into gaming and still is
"just make sure there are some good GAMES for the rest of us."
Nope they don't care its the first part they care about, all evidence points to that
You then look at how much gold and silver you have compared to your other friend, see trophies do have more depth
Well I got platinum's to two of my favorite games UC and UC2. I am going to try for WKC
nope didn't force, already were in the workings for Sony
"Nintendo said they were looking into Motion controls since 2000. So I would probably take there word on it."
Yeah they say it but they don't show it, here watch an actual demo that was taken in 2004, but the tech was shown in 2001, Sony had tech way before Nintendo
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
On Jack Tretton's comment it was considered a joke and true. Wii is targeted to a younger audience, the 360 had the RROD so were is the falseness in that
Wii is an impulse buy. Those things fly off the shelf, and is considered a side console not really a primary console as most 'gamers' have a 360 an PS3 as their primary again where is the falseness?
No one knew how good the DS was going to be in the future, he was wrong at that though, but who ...
they wanted to get the motion control right and not settle for waggle. Just like they didn't want to bring out the PS3 the same year the 360 came out they wanted to make sure it was the best product
So where's your Blu-ray and 3D???
I always thought the younger Sigourney Weaver when she starred in Aliens was the best Samus
So America equals the world???
Edit: What I'm saying is how is it bad for Sony when they demolish the 360 in Japan. Should I look at the media create hardware numbers and say "It's not looking good for MS" a 40,000 difference is easily made up in 2 weeks in Japan so where's the Sony is doomed there?