hey little buddy, you accidentally forgot to read the posts above yours! OOPS!.
If the 360 could run KZ2, it WOULD NOT HAVE by now. Because it is an exclusive and they are not allowed to make Killzone for the 360. /pat. The PS3 isnt stronger, but dont beleive me! why dont you look up the specifications of both systems yourself! You have taken introductory math right? you should be able to figure out the numbers! YAY!. Oh and hey there little guy, Uncharted2, Heavy Rain, and Infam...
A PS3 Fanboy wont admit his paltform is, clearly, inferior. Thats even more obvious.
Plus he doesnt work at Bungie scrub. It's no wonder you cannot read the hardware specs of the PS3 and 360 and make your own calculations, considering you cannot even read the article.
THE ONE AND ONLY SINGLE VALID POINT IN THIS ENTIRE FORUM IS
"if the 360 can do it, then why hasnt it"
KZ2 WONT be done on the 360, because Guerilla wont LET IT BE DONE.
And the reason the 360 hasn't produced anything (as ugly as) KZ2, is because KZ2 came out under 2 months ago you scrubs.
You expect 360 devs to create a game that looks stunning, in under 2 months, in response to KZ2. are you stupid? Not to mention, most 360 devs are busy ...
I am bumping Someanimals post. albeit it somewhat satirical, it is relevant to this forum. His analysis of all of you is dead on. chuckle.
Someanimalsdance =
it is incredibly likely that the 360 version will have higher FPS and higher texture resolution. This is a trend that has continued through nearly every multi-platform title. But when this happens, the PS3boys will have several, if not thousands of excuses WHY this is the case.
They will try to claim that ...
You are stupid, you have proven it over and over again. You are making all the other PS3 fanboys look bad.
Your first article, once again, has a broken link and is the SAME article on ray-tracing. WHICH NEITHER THE 360 NOR the PS3 use. They do not USE ray-tracing. understood?
your second article states
"Corel demonstrated the SE1000 on a special and Cell-optimized version of its DVD MovieFactory application, transcoding 1080p H.264 video to a smaller...
first off "forums" are not legitimate resources.
Second, let me get all my laughter out before i post on your stupidity.
What someanimals said is not only correct, but you just reinforced it. THE FORUM that you just posted claims that the PS3 has better graphics than a PC using a 8800 ultra. A comparsion of the entire system. Also the link to the article is DEAD, good job checking. I have read the article before and it merely claims the Cell is better at r...
The PS3 isnt stronger, and claiming such doesnt make it true. Why dont you google the hardware specs and performance before posting such stupid contrived statements.
Your reply seems to insinuate that just because FFXIII is now a muit-platform game that it has been downgraded on the ps3? your a joke. Not only does this make no SENSE, but since it was originally exclusive; how do you know it looked better on the PS3? THERE was no 360 version, and for all you know had it been 360 ...
The 360 version IS NOT being downgraded. The PS3 Boys are just insuniating that it will be or should be because they are upset that the article claims the ps3 is being maxed out, and they think that the PS3 is far more powerful than the 360. The games are supposed to be relatively identical on both systems, and i would suspect the 360 version to be on 2-3 discs. Mostly likely 2.
relative to my statement above. If you knew the LEAST bit about the hardware in either system, if you knew simple math calculations, or if you where able to use basic logic to relate the two. You would understand that no the PS3 ISNT just warming up, nor is the 360 running on fumes. You would also be-able to further understand why gaming computers, which blow both the 360 and PS3 out of the water, continue to use multi-cored, multi-threaded processors. You would recognize "wow The cell p...
Why dont you try to at least be a little constructive like Someanimals was. Hardly anything he said in his post was opinionated, and its ridiculous for you to post such a stupid comment, including the PURE FANBOY one you just posted below.
But its more realistic to compare a Thread to the SPU.
The Cell- 1 main processor, and 8 SPU's, one SPU is locked for what they call "redundancy". So in essence thats main-core+7spu's = 8 'threads'
360 has 3 cores with 2 threads each. so 3x2 = 6 threads.
Difference is that the 360's threads are capable of higher/more calculations. the PS3 'threads' (spu's) are capable of more focused/specific calculations.
grats on posting an article that came out before both systems are released... and doesn't even specifically imply that either system is better. Why don't you just look at the specs......................... ..................dot dot dot.... dot?
The Cell is an amazing processor.. given. It is not an amazing gaming processor which is why YEARS later the leading gaming platform(the PC) continues to release multi-cored, multi-threaded processors. Quad-core is where its AT? anyone wit...
Am i the only one not impressed? framerate drops, 3 second cyclops animation? and the setting.. Giant gray tiles infront of a giant gray cliff? ICK! the heavenly sword demo video was so much more... impressive. I'm not a PS3 FAN, but im a huge GoW fan, and i gotta say i was expecting something flashier!
Read my comparison on the hardware specs of the PS3 and 360. After reading it, when you purposely disagree with it out of pure PS3 Fanboyism, go ahead and look up the information on your own.
Only you PS3 Fanboys would come into a forum about an amazing engine capable of running on BOTH MACHINES, and somehow believe it was your opportunity to undermine the competition. When i look at both videos, i see the exact same thing. Only difference is the obvious foggy textures, Lack of a...
I really don's see an overly obvious difference between both cryengine3 on both consoles. But take a minute to look at the shadows casted on the pillar in-front of the player at 00:54 seconds. The 360 has clearly defined shadows, the PS3 shadows actually... Pop in, and lag creating a distortion in shadows. I dont know why you are all saying it looks better on the ps3, mind taking a Screen shot? To be completely honest, i don't see this engine running appropriately on either machine... but i g...
ya but regardless the threads are general purpose and can do anything a developer wants them to. im going to quote IGN's article on the 360 vs the ps3, just becuase im to lazy and tired to type it up myself.
"The Xbox 360 processor was designed to give game developers the power that they actually need, in an easy to use form. The Cell processor has impressive streaming floating-point power that is of limited use for games.
The majority of game code is a mix...
One of the most important part of reading, is being able to comprehend, interpret, and analyze what you read. That is why to this day i am confused, in particular with Sony Fan boys. How is it exactly, that you can go read about the hardware specs of both consoles, read what they can do; what they cant do, read about how the xbox is doing very well in sales, read about how all your exclusives are coming to xbox, read about how the 360's online is better. read about..everyting... and not under...
BECAUSE KZ2 CAME OUT LESS THAN TWO MONTHS AGO YOU SCRUB
Do you seriously expect a MS developer to develop a game that looks better than KZ2 in under 2 months, in response?
HOWEVER that IS NOT EVEN relevant, because it is YOUR OPINION that KZ2 looks good(better), it is not a FACT. I could JUST AS EASILY say, "when is the PS3 gonna have a Killer APP like GEARS2?". It looks 20x better, runs better, higher FPS, higher texture res. ETC. UNLIKE YOU, whom just gi...