That's it Square, make TWO sequels to one of the worst RPG's i've ever played, and easily the worst Final Fantasy i've ever played.
f***ing idiots.
How to animate poorly.
Yes, do you want to stay in the past and never progress, do you want to still be playing pong and original pac man? because without new consoles that's what we'd be playing.
Because I feel it deffinantly justifys being more than "good" but that's my opinion, and you have yours, I don't mean it dissrespectfully, I just feel if Skyrim can get 9s and 10s all over the board (i'm not hating on Skyrim, I love Skyrim) but if Skyrim can get 9s and 10s all over, then 7 is way too low for how good Darksiders 2 is (again, my opinion)
I enjoyed the first one, finished it, but it never wowed me, Darksiders 2 is leagues above the first and one of the best RPG's i've played in a long time, 7/10 is an insulting score for the work that clearly went into that game.
every year same old shit, every year the fanboys still buy em thinking it's different, just like the cod fanboys.
or you could just buy the games dirt cheap off steam and use anti aliasing, antisotropic filtering, 1080p etc and it will look miles better than an HD remake.
bad facial animations (especially cameron,naomi and brodus, they all look special needs) and ziggler doesn't have his ass wiggle on the ramp, i didn't look at the other videos.
get your shit together Yukes/THQ
What a horrible list...
games been out forever and it's still broken to hell, and they path things that don't need patching, like them totally nerfing air support and making things lock onto and fire at them way faster.
never buying another dice game again after the abomination that is battlefield 3, game could have been great, if it werent for all the un-necessary nerfs/buffs, ignoring of actual problems, and blatant money hungry whoring with all this premium/dlc and unlocking upgrades for ...
It's pathetic releasing DLC like 2 days after your game comes out, also Nocturne, you're mentally challenged, to put it politely. Hating on bad DLC for a game unrelated to COD or any FPS for that matter doesn't make you a "COD fanboy" you damn fool.
Yes, let's pay £30/$60 for a game that is exactly the same as the console version, which we could pick up for 1/3rd of that, which uses games for windows live, that will inevitably lose us our save data (an issue console users don't have to worry about) and will look ugly as hell blown up to 1080p resolution when it runs in 720, and caps out at 30 fps for no aparant reason whatsoever.
No, let's not, great game, horrible spit in the face of a port, buy it on c...
lives up to the gameplay hype, not the "this will be a great pc port" hype, because it's a really shoddy pc port, not on the level of dark souls shoddy though thankfully.
they say this every year, and every year it's just like cena, same old shit.
I've never seen the appeal of trophies, I don't care personally.
How did this get approved.
whoever disagreed with me clearly sucks at spelunky and dark souls.
Spelunky isn't that hard at all, Shadow of the Beast is the hardest game i've personally ever played, and you listed Dark Souls too? seriously? sure it's not a walk in the park, but thousands of people have beaten it, stupid list is stupid.
duke nukem forever, final fantasy 13, no contest.
I love Skyrim but even I struggle to think of a memorable character, nothing wrong with the voice acting, but the characters are all personalityless. it's a shame.