I appreciate your reasonable response, because it doesn't happen very often here. Now on to your responses.I have LBP and it is, I can honestly say, that I never get mad at when I fail and when I play it I always have a smile. Its lots of fun, and the basis of it is very easy. It does get very hard when you try to get all the hidden stuff and go everywhere. But lets be honest, its aimed at the casual crowd for sure. Yes MS and Sony are going to release casual games, and yes they do that becau...
360 fanboys and PS3 fanboys need to realise one thing, and that is they are fighting for second place. As much as no one wants to admit it, because most of the time the excuse is, "the 360 and PS3 aren't going after the same crowd as the Wii." Which is funny because one of the PS3's best games is made for the casual "Wii" crowd, and the 360 tries like hell to sell to the casual "Wii" crowd with the Arcade version. Why any of you care so much about these sales num...
that if it is online, then it has to be truth?
very funny
@7 - LBP is just an enjoyable game. I am a "hardcore" gamer, I like shooters, stealth action games, games that are generally geared towards older people, but playing LBP just brings a smile to face everytime. Its super easy, yet very difficult if you try to get everything. The controls are good. If anyone thinks that any game is the second coming of anything besides a sequel, is just a dumb fanboy.
@7.2 - please don't try to associate gamers or "the industry" with me...
I just wanted to know about where these crazy names came from.
I am not trying to doubt you at all, but I have seriously never heard those names before. In my defense they make no sense at all. Where were they called this? I am not trying to be an ass or anything, I seriously just want to know.
what does SFC, FC, or MD stand for?
So why is it that Cliffy B gets to much praise? Because he has made another amazing game? Or maybe a game that sold over 2 million copies already. Some of you make no sense. Yes he isn't the best guy in the world, but he sure does bring video games to the fore front of the media.
They do it because they are a business and want to make money. Until people stop buying there product, why would they stop? The majority of people love Nintendo, based on the fact that they sell a crap ton of hardware. Why would they care what a small group of "hardcore" fans think? Hell, they basically print money now anytime they sell a DS or a Wii.
hahahahahahhahahahahhaha! You all should drink. Its way better.
about N4G, everyone thinks that there are certain people that have like 50 accounts. Sweet Jesus I hope no one has anymore than 3 accounts. I really don't believe anyone has anymore than 3 accounts. But is funny to see that some of you think that people have 20 or 30 different accounts to get there point across. You give way to much credit to people, way to much. People aren't that dedicated.
IBM doesn't use windows anymore? Well that is news to me, thanks for clearing that up. So Sony just makes laptops now also? Didn't know that, thought they still made PC's, thanks again. I also like how you compare a computer based company (IBM) to a company that is far more diverse (Sony). But I guess in your mind it makes sense. I enjoy these great conversations that happen here on N4G, they always make me want to come back and keep posting.
its really amazing how little you know about business. Sony should drop windows? Wow, all I can say to that is Wow.
only the start of the game, and it is this intense already, oh how great this game is going to be. Those 10 minutes, or as it should say, 11 minutes, are no spoiler at all. It is made up of some things seen before, but some not seen. The atmosphere that insomniac creates is amazing.
you guys are right. A video gaming site is biased towards one video game console. Kotaku wants the 360 to win. If that is what you really believe, then wow, just wow.
I try to figure out why people only have 2 bubbles, then I read what they write. Ha ha. You could maybe be more of a fanboy but that would be hard to do.
can see the bias on these boards by this story alone. The fact that R1 didn't and still doesn't compete in the graphics category with anything that came out on the 360 at the same time, that the sequel looks amazing. But with GOW and GOW2, the fact that they don't look that different at first, even though GOW2 looks far better than GOW, the Sony fanboys try like hell to validate only owning just the PS3. It is really amazing. You won't believe me, but I really do own the PS3 and 360, and they...
You obviously have no idea what a sequel is supposed to be. Especially when the first is a GOTY and receives multiple awards for being great. Why would they change that much? So they improved the graphics, and game play, and increased the action, but its going to be more of the same? You obviously aren't going to like GOW2 no matter what, so why comment?
I don't want any of you to be surprised when the November numbers come out from NPD and the 360 sells around 500,000. GoW2 is much bigger than alot of you want to give it credit for.