and let me guess, you know better, amirite?
No offence, but that made no sense what so ever.
m.
I think PSN+ is a great idea. And, you just basicly justified XBLA sikbeta. You are aware of that right?
Dont you guys find it a little Ironic.
Sony fans say.. XBL sucks, why pay for for this PSN lets you have for free.
Which is only online multiplayer, now which I agree is ahuge.
But now, it seesm paying for cross game chat is fine, a feature which is part of the XBL paying service. `
all the people defending and showing why PSN+ is worth it is just so so funny imho, most of these people ragged on XBL as Xbox fans defen...
same as all the other console makers, why so mad?
TO be fair, Harmonix`s Dance Central looks pretty damn promising.
Edit: And I respect that. However do you think the average family houshold will? That game is DDR done right, with actual dancing, think about it. You do understand the possible mass market appeal of such a product though right?
Good for you man, Sorcery looks fun, I am excited to play it. And I will also be buying move day one.
once again, I am reminded of the internet hive logic, and how it fails.
The people defending the Wii where, seen as retarded a few years ago also,
http://boards.ign.com/ninte...
@maddhater123
oh, but before the standard was motion controls, just 5 years ago, people where laughing at Nintendo and the Wii on boards and comment sections....
what is more important, cross game chat, online play, or both?
and a second question, is paying for both worth it?
Edit: Good stuff Da_shredder, and I agree, these kinds of features are why I though Live was worth the 50$ a year, and they are also the kinds of features that will Justify PSN+`s 50$ a year.
I like how you just basicly justified Live, it is refreshing to see people seeing the advantages of a paying service like live, MS should make the silver packadge have online play, but take out cross game chat and other feature, like PSN+ is doing it.
And I agree, PSN+ is totally worth it. But I will keep my steam on my PC, no need for it on the PS3, at least not for me However I am happy at the possibility that some people would find use in it though. That is if they don`t...
don`t you have a PC for that? I mean, I am all for the amazing PS3 exclussives, but CS:S is already pretty bad ass, on PC.
What I learned from this comment.
DA_Shredder is willing to pay a year subscribtion simply for cross game chat.
What I learned from this Story.
People are willing to pay a yearly subscription to play games that are already available on the PC.
is it me, or is the sony fandom world all upside down atm? At least judging from comments talking about xbox exclussives being on the PC and the fact that Live is not worth the...
aww, the internet Debbie downer syndrom....
I would like to refer you all to an interesting ign thread, right after the Wii name was announced. I like to read it every now and then, just to remind me how the anonymous opinion of dozens of grumpy hating gamers mean, well, nothing.
http://boards.ign.com/ninte...
stop hating guys, go play the games yo...
Sony with their sold to retailer quotes, and MS with their shipments..
same sh*t, different pile.
Well, I think it is time we bring up all the threads, and posts and topics and news pieces I remember after Wii was announced...
Wii name is horrible, FAIL...
Playing the Wii makes you look stupid...
Nintendo is done, motion controlers will never work....
Seriously, the Wii graphics looks like a gamecube, 360 and PS3 will battle for top spot this gen...
yeah...you get my point?
149$ for the full experience, it not bad, it is right up there with the Wii and the Move.
think about it, 3 extra controlers for the Wii, or the Move is in the 200$ range.
is the guy not allowed to have an opinion?
you forgot. "Definitive"
He just means that the casual market is bigger. And that fact that is a bigger market, it clearly is an important sellimng factor for something like Kinect.