If they don't censor, gaming "media and journalists" scream : sexism, misoginy, oversexualization....
They do censor those games, gaming "media and journalists" scream : censorship, arrogant Sony....
Bipolarism is a serious sickness, we must not take it lightly. Let's help those people.
Nope. I just think that many outlets and gamers are refusing to address the elephant in the room, by moving the goalposts.
People don't complain because they don't like the game. They complain because this game controls are HORRIBLE.
That's it. The game is great elsewhere, but the core controls are AWFUL. There's no way around it. And sadly, it's a trademark of many Rockstar games...
EDIT : Oh and I forgot to mention that... ...
Daredevil !!!!!
You are tripping man. Loool. It's like asking: how can Kratos struggle agains mere Ogres if he can beat the shit out of Zeus with his bare hands ? I'm sry, but that's plain ridiculous.
You are waisting your time, anything that seems hard or where you fight with an axe is Dark Souls these days, especially with most of 7th gen gamers...
Well, one could objectively say... that it is a LOT MORE than what "some" competitors say.
@Citizen
It was 80% pirate and 20% assassins. Not a very good balance.
AC IV Black Flag was good but it was more a Pirate game than an Assassins' one. In fact, it's a mediocre game as an AC game.
It's not an option, it derails the focus of the game from assassins vs templars, to not necessary stuff.
Yh, BUT this is an ASSASSINS game not a PIRATES one. And that's why Black Flag while being a good game was a MEDIOCRE assassin's game.
Well I already understood that. That's why it's really sad.
Listen or watch. I'm not questioning the quality of Nintendo exclusives. If you look carefully, out of the BIG 3, Sony is the one who pulls out the most new IPs (great, good or not). New IPs are a risk, a bet on a potential. In rare cases, new IPs a immediately a big success.
Sony is the one who takes the most risk in that department. Even during the PS3 era, when they were struggling financially. There's no fanboyism there. Nintendo still relies on old successful franchises ...
I read all this, and nowhere there's an expectation for a new IP. Which is sad really. What is even more sad, is most Nintendo fans not asking Nintendo new IPs. All they want is remakes/reboots of older games, Metroid....
Don't you guys want to see new AAA IP (of Zelda scope) from Nintendo? Aren't you fed up with the same games each gen ?
This is tiring (-__- ) ......
So let's take a minute and think about it. You mean after the failed experiment Ubisoft made with AC-Unity partnership with MS (bundles, ads) they're gonna do it again with their next AC game, for its comeback ?
I wouldn't do that if I were running the business strategy but I don't. So, lool, whatever.
Either they announced a Pokemon (Full 3D) on Switch or a BIG AAA new IP. Really tired of the same old, same old Nintendo release each gen.
yh sry, i was mistaken.
30 million...
No.
Nah. All I see is ppl happy to the perspective of getting more consistent experiences thanks to this boost. (stable framerate mostly). Pretty much noone is talking about going from 30 to 60 fps for existing non-patched games. The article is still up and anyone can check the majority of the comments.
Either you've scrolled through the wrong comment section or you just made that up...
How can so many of you people miss Amy Henning point ENTIRELY ??? She's not saying singleplayers are dead. But that, pitching ideas for such games is becoming very difficult, because many publishers want GaaS. SP experience like UC 1 with one beginning, one end, and no furthermore content down the line, are not welcomed by publishers.