It is a part of Crytek's image to bash other games and systems in order to prove something
This site is being run by Pakistanis, therefore no game company will send a copy to them or anyone else outside US or EU.
The site has questionable authority since it rarely checks the sources as well as their content. I myself have witnessed a lot of stupidity made by them.
But I dont think that the review is fake, meaning that I believe that they do have a copy, but how good is their review is anyone's guess.
Go play DA:Origins, best money you are ever gonna spend on a game...
Agree, ho did this got approved?
@windblowsagain
The biggest problem in Bf4 is a low server tic rate. Bf4 servers work at only 10tics which means that the servers sees only 10 fps all the time which is for a game of this caliber disgraceful. CS;GO has servers with 120 tics which makes it much easier to track user movement, hit boxes as well as bullet trajectory.
IF EA and DICE havent implemented 128 tic servers by now, they are never gonna do it, they can patch this game how much they want, its stil...
@kevnb
I have fx 6300 and gtx 660Ti and most of the time i get around 35-57 fps, but when i engage in 50+ player battles my fps drops to 15 sometimes even to 10.
This benchmark is OK, its maybe the only one on the net that it shows actual in game CPU performance.
I kinda agree. On the other hand Bf4 has awful net code and hit boxes synchronization which makes it much worse as an fps game compared to PS2
@TheLeapist
Its not about bottlenecking... Intels CPUs give better frame rate. I have 4670k and my frien has FX 8350, we compared those CPus in BF4 on the same card (GTx680) and 4670 blows fx 8350 right out of the water (30%+) with GPU usage on both systems being 99% all of the time. Its just how it is atm. Something might change with Mantle but till we see it really in action its Intel just does it better.
Fan boy arguments in PC department are at least 4 times worse than Console department. But benchmarks this this give precise insight when it comes to the actual performance of every individual component. With consoles you dont really have that so its all about hear-say and meaningless arguments (although PS4 is better but its still poor compared with any other decent PC). You will not make a mistake when you buy a PC just make sure you choose components wisely.
Well that depends on the GPU you have as well, you know?
Oh God...
The most frustrating thing about suppression isnt the flinching (yes that's how its called) its the fact that you cant see anythi, who is shooting at you or where to run at. This helps a bit, its not the ultimate fix cause even if it was it would be called cheating, Comprende?
Nope, this is a legit fix.
That's the beauty of the PC platform is that you can tweak whatever its available. There have been tweaks for Bf3 and so on and no one got banned. Even Bf4 battlelog moderator confirmed that there is nothing wrong with this. Now if some console players are feeling the buthurt, I cant really help with that...
So whats the magic number? 35?
Agreed. This new trend of releasing games in the Beta state needs to stop if EA and DICE want to sell any games in the future.
DICE bit off more than they could chew, as usual...
XD
Nice one!
i wonder which company will be voted to be the worst one in America... again... ^-^
read the article, DICE wont be making this game, what ever the hell it was....
This is fake, the person that was kicked was not not Patrick Bach
http://battlelog.battlefiel...
the_hitman3000
Its not the same when you make one game for one platform and porting the same game to 3 platforms. ND has that luxury of taking the time to optimize their games to the max, I am kinda suspicious they would have the same result if they were dong it for the PC and Xbox.
But I agree that Crytek games are boring in best case scenario.