CRank: 5Score: 19730

This article has a tinge of irony considering what they just tried to pull with Resident Evil 2, though they rightly went back on it. Doesn't even mention it, strangely.

1373d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Expected better from one of the writers of Peep Show

1444d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Until Matsuda is forced out, I think Square will continue this negative trajectory. FFVII was a success, so is XIV but there's so many misfires, especially in its publishing arm.

1466d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Knowing Square probably like 5m with 10m lifetime

1488d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

A rare piece of genuine thought and writing on here

1641d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

There's been a handful of articles over the years about how smaller developers have succeeded and value the service. Not really sure who the others are that you mention but there's still a question mark over the profitability of a bigger external title like Outriders or Back 4 Blood launching on the service.

1654d ago 7 agree2 disagreeView comment

Should this be true, where does that leave the supposedly far through negotiations with Xbox? Because surely he wouldn't take this to them.

1668d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

The mystery that is En Fore Gee

1764d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Halo 4 was a strange one. It was ahead of its time for some of the level design. I remember Cliff Bleszinski exclaiming on Twitter about the sequence with the moving walls and how the 360 was being pushed to it's limit.

1979d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

$7.5b cash for them. Absolutely bonkers

2010d ago 13 agree2 disagreeView comment

Regardless of whether that statement is true. It's 100% a marketing ploy. People are talking about the game, that's all that matters, sometimes.

2066d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

True but I think some people assume a publisher just slaps their name on a project and sends it to market. It's a dangerous line to walk from going from moderate success via publishers to self publishing. They're playing it safe and smart here. They've never published anything themselves so they need to make sure they get used to the process, there's plenty of things they can trip up on that have traditionally been done for them by the publishers.

2235d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nonsense. I'll concede that it's not a true Banjo sequel like people wanted but it took the concept and executed in a fun and interesting way. The two games that isn't above were forgettable at best.

2322d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

The word you're thinking of is garrotte

2341d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Holy mother of marketing
How many advisements can you get on a very weak article

2400d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Misleading as both Subnautica games have important plot that requires you to go on land

2415d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Missed an absolute sitter of a headline there...
The Surge 2 is Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger

2438d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

To be fair, Nuts and Bolts is a great game. It's just not Banjo 3.

2485d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

It's just a fantastic and in depth Eurogamer article regurgitated twice.
Search Eurogamer Why Xbox Failed in Japan, article by Wesley Yin-Poole
(Can't post link because I'm new)

2503d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment