finally someone has said ps3 is superior than 360. i remember back when bayonetta came out and EVERYONE talked trash about the ps3 port. yes i understand it was a different company for port, but this just shows this time around the table has turned!
who doesn't like a girl eating pizza!
wtf why does this article have to be about enslaved? why not choose a stupid movie game. enslaved is competing against some big titles this month including fall out. 80,000 units is a lot for a sleeper it!
this just shows no matter how big a company nor game is there will always have issues with when it's released!
where is the source? i don't see any proof. and it can not be a some random person average joe writing a review.
why would the producer of saga say it will take 10 hours? hmmm which source is legit, not hard to tell i'd say.
this is NOT A LEGIT review. several other reviews had said this game is well over 4 hours first time through. game informer is bunch of idiots!
since when does the length of a game justify value of price?? what happen to good o' replay value instead. what has this industry come to? i wouldn't be surprised if graphics justify value for price.
another proof that gameinformer is pos. 10 hours legit especially coming the producer itself. as for ign's review i don't think they just played vanquish on easy mode to get 6-7 hours of completion.
hahahaha i knew this day would come. i love my netflix on my ps3 even more now!
wow looks like the game will suffer on audio and maybe graphics on 360 then. i'm sure there will be a comparison article here soon about both versions of vanquish. although no surprise that 360 always has issues with space for developers.
i still don't know what this game is about lol. need more info
looks like they did not play the game all the way through. what kind of bs is vanquish will take you 4 hours to beat even on easy mode. hmmm i wonder if they only play 40 mintues of the game. IGN STATED the game will last 6-7 HOURS! which is fine with me it's standard for shooters
I WILL NEVER TRUST GAMEINFORMER FROM HERE OUT
the game DOES NOT TAKE 4 HOURS TO BEAT. according to ign.com it takes 6-7 ours to beat. here is the source
http://ps3.ign.com/articles...
what is the odds of this?? so many people did not like the bayonetta, yet now we have someone that is huge in the game industry and stated he wish he would have been part of bayonetta. what i'm wondering is where is all the fan boys of epic? this is another reason why bayonetta should not be judged by it's books.
hmm more like game informer only played 4 hours of the game. i don't believe the game is that short. so far there is only 1 review for vanquish that states being short. there is no evidence as of right now.
uh looks like someone is behind on their news. kojima said himself he will not be any way of involvement with rising.
ok where is jp's twitter comment?? it's as if it doesn't exit
the funny thing is, bayonetta got mixed reviews and majority on what i have read online forums like they did not like the game because it wasn't "god of war." now all of a sudden after jaffe say's bayonetta is better in it's own ways and all of a sudden everyone agrees??!! all of a suddent he FAN BOYS of bayonetta comes out and FAN BOYS of gow went behind doors...hmm
i agree what jaffe says. gow one was superb after that it went down hill. this just show...
yes that's what the american industry wants. that is the first thing you hear is about how great the game looks, then rest you hear for reviews.
ya if you play it on CASUAL-AUTO (super easy). then it's a 4 hour game. i'm playing it on hard and it is taking me beyond 4 hours and i am not even half way through the game yet. i'm having a blast, that's all it matters. people need to stop complaining about how short a game is. since when does length of a game make a game suck because it's short??!!