yea I know what you mean bro, but the patch fixed all of those issues. So I don't know what this guy is talking about.
wait a minute, comparing which version side by side, AC:1 or AC:2?
I don't see the point of this article, AC 1 for the both the PS3 and Xbox 360 had frame rate issues, so why bash one and not the other?
probably because they send a patch to fix it. The patch also fix the freezing issues some people were having.
I think 95% of the games that come out need a story to it, in order to create a franchise. Adam Sessler said best, " not every game needs a multiplayer mode in it. There's two major games that are well established that can come out as straight multiplayer titles and that's Halo and COD. For example Capcom's resident evil series was famous because of the story. They completly messed up RE 5 by adding that stupid multiplayer mode in the game. People that just play games just for multiplaye...
wasn't this information already posted?
fanboys are retarded, they're always going to argue with each other, over the dumbest sh!t. People from LoT and Eurogamer can change this, but instead they promote it, because it's easy.
yo my dude, these guys at LoT are straight clowns. They don't play games, they count pixels and frame rates. Nobody on N4G is going play the game on one those devices, so who gives a rat's ass? Comparisons are becoming a thing of the past, seeing how multi-platform titles are becoming so close, that you need a frame rate analysis to tell the difference.
So in order for us to see a difference, we have to put it on one these frame rate devices? Come on LoT, can you guys produce anything original? News flash, Eurogamer got the comparisons department on lock, so there's no need for copycats.
I think they should've waited to post this article until they had all the information, how our they're going to assume the PS3 is in a lower resolution, because the 360 is?
Are you serious? you're just as Ignorant as this fool.
IGN is destroying their own image. I still shock how this article got improve. This is something you expect from Kotaku.
it's in the xbox version too
will you xbox owners please stop reaching
Stop reaching, your swallowing Microsoft hard. Nobody say anything about the Xbox version of Bayonetta in the first so what are you trying to prove?
why are the editors from kotaku and 1up.com looking for issues in the PS3 version of the game? Obviously they're not there, so what the hell?
I'm pretty sure both versions will be fine, 1up.com is reason for starting this whole " the PS3 version of Bayonetta is not on par with the 360" and even after seeing that their previous accusations were false, they still try to find a way to bomb the PS3 version. I wonder why no one ever point the 360 issues out, it's always the PS3? 1up.com is full of sh!t, they contradicted themselves and they're trying to justify by trying convince themselves and the Xbox community that 360 vers...
which version is that?
The game is fun, but I don't think it's pushing the systems graphically, these whole comparisons are for the fanboys, so let them make fools of themselves.