No, It was posted ON SPG but by a NEW member, with 1 post only.
Are people blind? It's clear in these pics that the Xbox 360 version is made to look superior. I believe these imagies were put together by a xbox 360 fanboy as they seem unfair to the ps3 version.
9.0 is the score for the lazy.
Xbox 360 recieved 9.6 I believe.
It would help if the images were taken side by side on the same locations, but a good comparison none the less. It seems both shots were taken off screen too.
I dont know why people are complaining about Kameo being 2 years old, I actually think Kameo looks better in most places.
Wow...this craps all over anything ive seen on the PS3 and Xbox 360
Australia love their Xbox.
Wasnt this game supposed to be much better on ps3? Because it supposedly took over 10 gigs of space? Thus sony fanboys claimed the 360 version was gimped?
What happend? but..Teh C3LL?
This looks terrible...
http://bp0.blogger.com/_qGt...
whats wrong with the textures?!
Shame the PS3 cant run games as efficiently. Was the PS3 designed for F@H + Bluray or games?
How did you own them?
Haha, sony fanboys never quit!
AAA am confirmed
Wow sony fans got owned.... again lol
wow, Xbox 360 is a monster.
I think he meant he is ugly. The review is spot on.
Seven. Point. Five.
:)
I think what he means is, Halo sets the benchmark.
wow this game looks even better then sigma!
But they are good on the xbox 360, the pics look better then the PS3 images.