This shit site has done this before. Gotta love when an unnamed writer hobbles together vague rumors and no source as a "confirmation." No mention from the developer anywhere in the article on a single damn thing. Mods here aren't doing their job in the slightest.
So, a really creepy, Nintendo version of "Wife Swap?"
All it needs is Fabio wearing Mario's overalls on the cover.
"If TLOU was made in the nineties Ellie would've been an 18 year old blonde with double D's."
...I'd play that.
I agree wholeheartedly, but for right or wrong, the PR machine just don't work that way, and I'm sure someone in the massive conglomerate that is EA's legal department is telling them at every step of the way NOT to apologize.
In the end, I feel bad for DICE for having to rush a project that, from what I've gathered, was a project that staffers explained EA that just wasn't ready yet. EA rushed production to beat rival Activision in CoD.
It would indeed be nice, but an apology is seen as an admission of wrongdoing, and so many companies today are completely unwilling to do that. They'd rather patch a leaky boat than admit they sent it out before it was seaworthy.
This article is a week old, and the tweet was already covered when it was actually timely. How is this still relevant?
It means good luck budgeting for the five DLC packs that will follow the game's release.
No one's celebrating his actions, rather that he's just one more in the long line of hypocritical politicians. The fact that he was caught for doing something so heinous should be celebrated. I can only hope he doesn't manage to worm out with some meager sentence.
That it is. Screen cap from one of the more recent trailers ( http://www.gamenguide.com/a...
Pred shows up at 2:28.
I'd see your point provided they never did Michael Meyers.
"[Update] This morning we received word from our source that this was a “social experiment” and that the information isn’t true."
"these" articles?
Ask the folks over at IndieDB, they held the vote.
Couldn't hurt to try...
I don't doubt that it's a bad game, but this article is awful. There's not a single mention of DRM examples anywhere within, no links to bad reviews mentioned, nothing. The first half of it seems cobbled together from a press release that talks up the game, which goes against the critical sounding headline. How'd this even get approved?
"Am I going to be fired for devoting an entire article to inconsistencies in the sizes of fictional tatas?"
As long as people keep reading, you might even get a bonus.
On a related noted, I'm happy I wasn't the only one who noticed the titty transformation.
Anyone else bothered by the comment in the article that says it's a fake account?
No links to any of the tweets mentioned in the article. How'd this thing get approval?
How is speculation from a Facebook post a confirmation? Who actually approves this shit?