.
Look better on PS3? Those are open world games. U fanboys don't know what your talking about.
they must have the versions mixed up or these previuos comparison articles fron CVG and Eurogamer are BS, and just to think I nearly fell for there biased cr@p.
but there was 1 problem. The contols had a slight delay to mimic the weighty feel of the weapons. Then why did ALL the weapons feel the same weight. For example the hand gun should have felt more nimble than the machine gun. The machine gun should have felt lighter than the rocket launcher. It wasn't like that, all weapons felt the same weight which I hope they change in KZ3.
On stage Bending over for M$ like Square did.
.
U should be pissed off and annoyed so R* doesn't do it again not taking it up the rear end.
U should be pissed off and annoyed so R* doesn't do it again not taking it up the rear end.
probably justified on the 360 version but not the PS3.
Due to the differences the PS3 version should have scored less. I'm sure R* had something to do with the PS3 reviews so it wouldn't affect sales.
Consumers have a right to be told the quality of something they are buying and not "hidden" which seems to have been done here.
Not one major site has mentioned any differences which is wrong. We as consumers should know what we are pur...
but framerate, pop in and so on. A great shame since it was mostly PS2 owners that supported R* last gen. We have just been kicked in the balls.
I dont buy Square games no more and now R* may be joining them.
.
I didn't pay £425 to play games at sub hd which are inferior to the 360 version. Its embarrasing and shameful that R* still cant code PS3 games as good as other developers.
Bioware, Bethesda were able to pull off superior looking PS3 games so R* has no excuse. Resolution does matter especially if its 720p on 360.
I have seen the comparisons are there is quite a difference. The PS3 version should have scored lower just to teach R* a lesson like it did with ba...
Ruining another PS3 exclusive. Dont they realise they are downgrading a potentially great gaming experience for PS3 owners.
Ofcourse not MS only think about themselves.
edit have Square made a game yet that has yet to acheive a 90+ on Metacritic this Generation?
From the looks of things they never will
Both have got the same scores
The reason the 360 versions meta score is higher is that most sites (that gave it a perfect score)have reviewed the 360 version. Im sure they would have given the PS3 version the same score. Also Eurogamers 8/10 score which was for both systems is missing from 360's Metascore.
More like Alan WAK. BTW where is the edge review score on Metacritic?
Jumping a sinking ship