CRank: 5Score: 15920

And this is why Sony will not do cross play, maybe next gen folks

2867d ago 13 agree9 disagreeView comment

Well yeah, but why are you ok with them taking away features? Whats wrong with having Battle Royal and a single player campaign? What is wrong with the consumer (us) having more features to enjoy?

2898d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't see any apologies ... All I see is it wasn't meant to be this way

3020d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

@dialga what about the three previous call of duty games that included weapons in the supply drops ..
It just a matter of time before this new CoD does it ... It a billion dollar money maker ... You better believe it's coming

3067d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

this is fantastic advise and I do see your point ... i arranged for my wife to press X to purchase this

3231d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well good luck on getting 14 million ... I bought the first one and felt very burned by it and have no interest in getting the 2nd one ... I'm sure many other folks feel the same way I do

3274d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

no .. whatever you have to say or try to justify the this ... simple answer is no

3288d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

MAG2 would be amazing ... MAKE IT HAPPEN SONY!

3393d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

to my understanding this is going to be fixed very soon

3427d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ummmm what?!?! The definitive edition hit 60fps...not sure why they can't do the same here

3568d ago 0 agree7 disagreeView comment

the biggest issue with destiny's microtransactions was when that racing event came up and they wanted to charge $10 for a record book on a limited event...TEN DOLLARS!! and yes YOU ARE part of the problem if you contribute to this because they keep testing the water with different and more expense and SMALL pieces of content

3678d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

what got me to stop playing was when the sparrow racing event came about...it was an alright game mode BUT BUT BUT the thing that boiled my beans was they wanted to charge $10 for a "stats" book..i know i know "YOU DONT HAVE TO BUY IT" but geez people, to me that was just the start of where they wanted to go with the game...slim content at a premium price

3735d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

a few of my friends have said the same thing, i wonder if this would really bring in more folks to try it out...IF they had an offline mode (which would be nice)

3735d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

i'm still waiting for this game to come to console!

3742d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

i really enjoyed this game in the short time that i played BUT i have since then moved on...this may be too little too late

3748d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Completely against this, matchmaking should be focused on connection and not K/D...

3782d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I was excited for it, played two matches then went back to call of duty...

3792d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

I don't see the issue here, the fact that games are being up rendered to 1080P and will have trophy support (among other features) is great! I'm already sold and will be buying Dark Cloud tomorrow. And YES I still have my PS2 along with this game and many other PS2 games...I love the fact that Sony and Microsoft are at least GIVING us options to play old titles.

3796d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

lets compare this year's COD with Battlefront...with COD you are getting 4 different types of flavors: single player, multiplayer, zombie mode and dead ops...with battlefront you are getting online multiplayer and offline multiplayer (bots)...im a HUGE battlefront fan but this is not a $60 game for me just like titanfall was not a $60 game for me

3817d ago 10 agree1 disagreeView comment

ouch, and great points

3849d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment