Love consoles? I love what is the best at the time to play videogames. A couple of bad ports? Lol. Read my articles. More like "a couple good ports" is what PC sees. This site is full of pc mustard race people and I get why there is butthurtness. But people need to take their heads out of their a**es, it's not 2000 where PC is a great platform for gaming.
"Star citizen does look much better than most consoles. Face facts. "
Talk about ...
"PC will always be leaps and bounds ahead of consoles,"
I wold gladly hear in what meaning did you said that? Seriously, no AAA exclusives basically, only multiplatform games, graphics on PS4 ex are the best thing nowadays, multiplatform games don't look much better on PC, just a tad, terrible lol-ports from consoles on PC, terrible performance on a GPU price of a console and I could go on and on.
Oh really? A game from 2016 will look better than a game from 2008? -.- wooow how freaking awesome! <sarcasm off>
By today's standards, this game looks pretty bad. Not terrible, but pretty bad. And it looks just just a tad better than F3.
@marlinfan10
Oh, here goes the "you are not right because I am right" arguments. Like the one with controls - "you are wrong because I played it for a hour and I got used to it". It's the same thinking as "Shit doesn't really taste that bad, I ate it for an hour and I got used to it". Argument about controlls is as valid as it could be, a LOT of people complained about it, and for me after playing godly awesome games with awesome controls like GTA...
Of course, n4g people had to show their fanboyism and had to disagree with my comment, while it's 100% true. This game hs problems, and these are facts, it's not my opinion. I'm talking about framerate, bugs, terrible controls (especially swimming underwater, GOD i hated it, it's superman 64 bad), pretty small world, it's smaller than oblivion and skyrim I think, and shitty inventory system, that takes a lot of effort to get to the menu.
WTF. Where does these 10/10s and 100/100s come frm for this game? Yeah sure it's pretty good, but that's it. No way it's better than GTA V, for the budget itself at least, you can feel while playing this game it was much much cheaper game than GTA 5. I hate when everyone jumps on the bandwagon of praising games, just because everyone else does so too. As i said, this game is good, but it's nowhere near 100/100. It has too much problems.
ohmygod I love these forums here! Say something negative about a product, even though it's based on facts, you will get thumbs down (facepalm). Based on this:
http://www.benchmark.pl/ran...
GPU Rank, it's slightly above 290x, which I know for a fact, doesnt run newer games in 1080p, ultra and 60 fps anymore, it does in 30fps (apart from these games that are lol-ports of old gen consoles lo...
I have also read that the creators of The Order said that the GPU memory alone was used only in 70-80%, and that was one of the first exclusie games, so after few years they would knew how to make it use about 50% of memory. And VRAM is a crucial to show how little of PS4 power is being used still, and that it holds a looot of power for developers to make games on it for next years. For example X360 GPU memory was used in 100% after one year and less, with games like Oblivion. And it took nex...
Same was being said about 780ti, too bad that after about a year it got pretty mediocre.
@WitWolfy
"If you can make a better game then by all means do!"
Oh, gotta love these comments like "He said something bad about my favourite game, I better tell him to make a better game" :D
You got it right, I just sold this game yesterday on auction and I'm getting my money back, so I'm glad about it. Getting bloodporn next.
@RaTaTaT
It was nothing like Witcher 3 on new platforms. GTA 5 sure had few fps drops here and there, but this game ran on a fucking 8 years old hardware, and the fps drops were very rare and totally didn't affect the gameplay and fun it brought. Witcher plays on 1,5 year old consoles like shit, it works on good PCs like shit too, you need a top tier cards in at least 2xsli if you want to play on uber with stable 30 fps. That's bullshit! Especially for a game that doesn't ...
Can't disagree. This game is so mediocre and it has so many problems, yet people prais it and CDP like it's god. This game has the biggest problem of stuttering and fps drops on every platform, yet they work on small things like little bugs, etc. This game was worked on for so many years and they couldn't make it at least 99% working? Look at R*, their games are close to perfection, they look and work awesome. If it was a game from ubisoft, it would have been bashed (and rightfull...
Yeah. IGNorants must have been paid large sums of money for them 10/10s. That's ridiculous.
Seriously? Things like good voice acting matter now? There are many games with awesome and great voice acting, like GTA and Skyrim, most games have good or very good voice acting so why is it so important in witcher 3? I don't hear other games to be praised that much for good voice acting.
Let me speak clearly, because obviously a opinion is a opinion, but what I will state here are facts about problems with this game:
1. First of all, and the most import...
This game is 7.5/10 at best. Now start the flame war.
Where have they all gone? Consoles, that's where. (At least most of them)
You can dislike my previous comment how many times you like, I don't care, but these are the facts. And I know butthurt pc fanboys don't like them ;).
So what? Consoles hardware should not be compared to PC hardware. It's like comparing PC hardware to this of space rockets... Look at PS2, it had freaking 300MHz prcessor (single)! It played every multiplatform game liek a charm, and at it's end of lie it had ganes like Black that looked just like PC games At the time. And the PCs at that time were 3.0GHz up and core 2 duos were around with 3,2 GHz on 2 cores. PCs need that extra memory, frequency etc. to not only play games but also ...
It will be on PC too.