Therefore those reviewers and gamers aren't reliable. Alien: Isolation is easily one of the best games this year without a doubt.
The performance is unacceptable on both platforms. Ubisoft, pull your shit together. This isn't a 30 fps game, it's a 20 fps game.
Did I hurt your Xbone sensibilities by bringing up the FACT that PS4 was the lead platform in sales? Boohoo.
What do you mean the article wasn't about "that"? The article was exactly about sales numbers. Unless you don't know how to read, of course.
So basically, you disagreed with me BECAUSE I stated facts.
It amazes me that there are people who disagree with facts. Let that sink in for a moment.
As of now, I've got 14 agrees and 7 disagrees. How can you disagree with fact? You people are what's wrong with the world.
PS4 was the best-selling platform with 35%.
@lipton101, sounds like you had an awesome childhood :D
What are you, 5?
1. Obviously you haven't played Titanfall
2. Huge amount of guns doesn't equal to better game.
Ps. This is coming from a PS4 gamer.
We get the first real next gen games when the developers stop creating cross-gen games.
Yeah we should stop talking about fps and resolution to better suit your Xbone sensibilities!
So let us analyze your statement.
Pretence: Looking at the review scores, the game is mediocre.
Fact: The game currently stands at 76 on PS4, which means the game has received generally favorable reviews.
Pretence: Looking at the user scores, the game is mediocre.
Fact: The user scores hardly represent the true quality of the game. The score is an aggregation of stupid people giving it 0s and 10s, which form the average score...
Calling Destiny a mediocre game really shows how out of touch with reality you are. It's a good game, not great, and definitely not mediocre.
PS4 > Xbox One in every aspect, especially multiplayer. U mad bro?
Because the original looks better.
"Literally the exact same as 3"
Literally? Literally the same? LITERALLY?
I enjoyed the hell out of Far Cry 3, and I'm glad, if Far Cry 4 is anything like Far Cry 3.
Frequently? Really? Are we over exaggerating a little bit now?
>amazing story and lore
>halo
pick one
I invested 30 hours into Skyrim. It never got good at any point, and after reaching the 30 hour mark, I just quit.
Your comparison with CSGO brings up a valid question. What is the context behind Counter-Strike? I like to think the highly competetive nature of the game is the context. As much as I like Titanfall, it lacks a certain kind of competetiveness that makes multiplayer intriguing. CSGO has this element.
I wish Titanfall was just a tad more "difficult", because now it's almost too easy to dominate a match if you are familiar with the fps genre.
I found it to be quite entertaining and full of potential. The only real worry is that it becomes too repetitive too fast.
Are you stupid?
"low player counts and bots are things that should not be seen in competitive FPS MPs."
CS:GO is highly competitive and it's 5 vs 5.