Hardly legitimate info. It's just a butthurt ex-mod trash talking the devs who fired him. However developing and playing War Z certainly hasn't been smooth sailing.
Stroking that epeen.
To those saying they never gave a release date for trophies and therefore can't have been late - guess what - trophies don't *get* release dates, they are a basic part of every proper PS3 game and are expected to ship along with the game. Any later than release date is late. Stop pretending they can't be blamed for late trophy support. It's like saying CoD can't be blamed for after-release online support. It's such a basic thing that it needs to be there from the start...
@gaffyh
8 times more powerful than a 360 is not in general very powerful, because the 360 is made up of 7 years old hardware. 8 years old if you account for a 2013 release. It's not a leap past PC specs of today, it's more a catching-up step.
Consider this. A new console in 2013 sold for $299 is gonna compete with PC hardware that people spend much more than 299 on, which, if anything, is even more up to date, as hardware is not released in far-in-between cy...
@ morkendo23
You can't possibly be serious, right?
WoW is a fantasy role playing game. You cann't even point a gun at someone. All the guns the game has are stat based and not controlled directly by the player, as with first person shooters.
And as for CoD, it's only a game. Murderous intent is not something you get from playing a game. The game doesn't make you wanna kill people. If you wanna murder a lot of people you're already insane. The game...
I never said that delays are bad in themselves.
I said that if a game is delayed, it should be more thoroughly critiqued. This does not by itself mean the game should loose points in the final review, but simply be reviewed more in-depth. If the game is delayed, then surely there is more to look after - after all, they did the delay for a reason, some part of the game must have been worked on more.
Honestly, don't you think it's fair to make more in-depth reviews of ga...
So when a game keeps being postponed and worked on, it should not be criticized as such?
If a game is 10 years in the making, don't you think it's fair to expect more from it, than a game that has only been in development for 2 years?
With the amount of time they had on GT5, they left a lot to be desired. The 2.0 update should have been launch material, and it should have been out a year earlier - at least - then it might have gotten more positive feedback.
...
I'll pirate it as well. But not because it's simply made by EA.
If I couldn't pirate it, I'd boycut the game because of what they're doing with the From Ashes DLC. So either way, I'm not planning on supporting them, when they are so blatantly trying to screw me over.
I can choose to either not support them by boycutting the game, or I can pirate it and not cheat myself from an amazing game.
Since id has not publicly said "these are early stages of Doom 4" it is NOT official. Learn what the word means.
It's not a matter of opinion what "official" means. It actually has a specific meaning, as with most other words. It's like saying "red color" doesn't necessarily refer to the color red, but sometimes to green, if you feel like it. It's nonsense.
The fact that one person said something doesn't make it official. It&...
The review seems very unprofessional. It very much looks like the reviewer never liked the idea of the Postal games to begin with and just wanted to give a 1/10 rating to some game, just to be part of the "critical" 1/10 scoring reviewers. It seems childish.
Sure, it's probably not GOTY material, but it's certainly not worth a 1/10 score either.
@reynod
Blizzard doesn't milk their games!? LOL!!
How about, lets say, WoW. That in itself is milking the warcraft franchise, and is further milking itself by releasing piss poor expansions one after another, charging money for each and every one of them, unlike other companies who release free expansions for their mmo's.
In reality though those expansions aren't free, as you pay a subscription to pay for development costs for expanding the game. W...
Did you even read the article?
"In order to see the best ending the game had to offer, you had to complete the game with an S-Rank. To do this, you had to destroy literally everything in a stage to get your Hit Rate to 100 percent. If you died, your Hit Rate percentage would subtract from your overall score. You needed 97% Hit Rate to get S-Rank which left room for only death per level and that’s only if you destroyed everything."
WHAT!? Because you don't have to wait in line at merchants!? Wtf kind of statement is that?
There are tons of other things that ruins the immersion in Skyrim, but it already has so much more than most other games.
How about the poor, repeating dialogue, few common voice actors, and ridiculous accents people seem to have? Or the fact that when a dragon attacks, the only people left standing are children, because in skyrim they are somehow immortal.
There are TONS...
You ever played Eve Online? In a corp called Eternal Profiteers? We used to have a member with your name :P
How do you get a follower to use magic?
You call yourself a realist huh?
In reality, it would be easy for the contributer of this article to state whether or not the article contains spoilers - even to what degree.
It's very easy, not time consuming, and helps a lot of people determining if they should read it, and contributers are already doing it all the time. You know why? Because it's not an unrealistically high expectation.
All you are, is a pessimist. And you're not even in touch with reali...
You don't think 95% is a very nice score?
Because that would be silly.
Oh yes it was.
He did seem very negative.
I guess I'll have to wait for reviews and more info on the game to make an opinion about it.
If it has all the magic that made SSX3 so great, then I'm sold.
They don't ban random people they "think" would re-buy. Who the hell would do that? The guy talking is just trash talking them because they fired him.