Seriously..... you never realized that its often cheaper to buy bundles? Never mind I just read your name and realized you care more about brand then making a decision for yourself.
Dance Central, Fantasia, Fru, Kinect Sports Rivals, Skype, Xbox Fitness, Voice commands, Instant log ins.
Kinect is already supported and its not even a year old. Now you can say something cliched that you have no interest in those games but that does not mean its unsupported.
I notice a lot of inconsistency amongst Sony fans. How is it that Microsoft is ridiculed for a few timed exclusives on Xbox One or multiplats like Titanfall but the PS4 has even more crossover with PC and many of its "Exclusives" are also on Ps3.
Also if MS neglected the Xbox 360 then apparently indies do not count because if every game counts then everyone of those Xbox Indie Channel games counts.
This console war BS would be less sickening if it ...
Games have Collector Editions all the time with no other way of getting the contents. World of Warcraft does this with every expansion and even at events for pets.
I believe there is nothing wrong with what CD Projekt is doing.
I think neither game is perfect but whether one amazing game is better than another amazing game really falls to personal tastes.
My gripe with both was the flaws in the multiplayer which begs the question: if a game with a great single player has flawed multiplayer, can that game still be "Perfect"?
I personally don't think so but the only game I would give a 10 too would be Final Fantasy 6 and Super Mario Bros 3.
I believe this article is an example of the bias that plagues this generation so far. If you dislike the Xbox One that is your preference and nothing is wrong with that. However why did you not make an article complaining that BloodBorne is a PS4 exclusive? What about Natural Doctrine? Why is okay for Sony to get third party exclusives but not MS?
Lets look at this realistically. This is a competition and Microsoft does not owe anything to Sony consumers and Sony owe...
What worries me is that I see Sony focusing on smaller titles like indies when I am hoping they start pulling out some Sony classics like Crash, Wild Arms etc.
Indies are great but I want to see them compliment more AAA titles. Now I am not saying the ps4 has no games because that is just a fallacy used by trolls. I just want to see more because I know Sony can bring it.
I think this is more fanboy chest pumping. Instead of relying on sales numbers as determining what wins we the consumers should focus on what these companies provide to us. If you think Sony won because you love the games on ps4 then more power to you.
The Wii sold more than the 360 and PS3 last gen and I would have to say that I preferred it the least but was glad that I the consumer owned all 3 consoles because that let me escape the console war BS and focus on what matter...
Woops, comment 2 was Meant to be a reply to your comment.
I believe that nearly all of the games under the 4 hour category are rather highly priced but the majority of PS3 titles are $7 for the weekly rentals. That excludes the PSN Indie titles.
Would it be easier to read if the PSN and PS3 titles were sorted separately?
Personally I agree with your assessment of hoping it was B/C. Especially considering Sony really pushed B/C as a major selling point for the PS2 and early model PS3s.
In the article I purposefully ignored the potential option for a monthly fee that Sony has hinted at. This analysis just took into account the prices and games available now.
Personally I think its not a bad deal however each of us needs to make that decision for ourselves as consumers. I just hope this will help consumers make a better informed decision before jumping on the hate train.
Microsoft was willing to help with the development costs of the game and in marketing. Smart move by Square especially considering the extra hype gained by being exclusive.
Also now Square can launch the game again a few months later on PC and perhaps on PlayStation 4. While it may suck for gamers who have to wait at the end of the day this is a business decision by Square and Microsoft and undoubtedly both companies did their homework before agreeing on the terms.
And some people say the Vita has no games.
Sony has stated that the PS4 is after the Wii market so what does that mean?
Now of course sales matter but then lets be consistent. That means that Halo 4 is better than the Last of Us which would mean that Halo MCC is one of the best values in gaming history.
Of course people are too busy being petty over an ad to accept what we all already know. Marketing ads will always say they are the best. Its our job as consumers to make up our own minds.
As cold as it may sound at the end of the day Microsoft does not owe anything to Sony consumers and vice versa. Personally I respect companies who fight for business and both companies are just as guilty of it.
At the end of the day if you are upset because you cannot play X game then do not blame the opposition but instead take some consumer responsibility for your purchase. That is why I am a multi-console owner. I did not want to get caught up in this US vs THEM bran...