COD4 is the game that will challenge it graphics wise- the only way that call of duty will challenge this graphics wise, is if you are comparing the cutscenes of call of duty to both realtime engines of killzone 2
...simply because of deffered rendering and a similar lighting system being used- your right, the lightening and deffered rendering systems are similar, except that killzone 2s is on the cg scale, and call of duty is just normal middle gen graphics and physics
...
yeah you keep saying what it cant do, but its capable of cg graphics, and your sh1t core cant do anything of the sort, you keep saying that the cell cant do this or that, but there are games that arent even tickling the ps3, like metal gear, drakes fortune, ratchet and clank, and killzone, and you have GT5, they all look like movies, so please those are only the beginning for the ps3, so if your pcs are so powerfull, and your 180 can outperform the ps3, then why arent your machines troppling ...
this game has hyper realism not seen ever in a game, it is a cutscene game, when you walk down the steps you can see the body movements, cause the gun moves when he walks down the steps, and when you push a button you actually see the hand push the button, that is amazing, whoever says sony lied after this, drown yourself
anyone that said sony lied about the ps3s graphics, go to phil harrison and dem, and tell them to take off their shoes and socks, and kiss their feet, they d...
i really dont realise why people say it didnt match it, duh, but it looks just as good or better, especially the weathering, and reactions, please stop with the COD4 and crysis sh1t, this early trailer already is making both of them look like old news, stop bringing them up
and of course the game can and will look even better with 8 months, so please give up the false talk
killzone ownin da day
you understand, crysis looks good, but how many people onscreen, and how many special affects, also wheathering? do you wanna really know how many pollygons were in that one level? and in one character? the blood was astounding, the game looks like a cg trailer, and when your working towards cg movie graphics the development time is enormous, the ps3 is a supercomputer, smaller condensed form of one, but it can do the same things as one, but it will take more time, and more man power,and a...
who is everyone fooling, there are parts of the gameplay in the e3 2007 trailer that surpass the e3 2005 one, in the 07 one there is tons and tons more things happening than the e3 2005 one, weathering, that amazing light display in the beginning, destructible environments, infact the polygon count in that trailer may just be greater than the ones in e3 2005, and also the characters are each gigantic with massive amounts of polygons, if this game isnt comming out til 2008 march, i am assuring...
jada likes paper mario ingame, anyway this game isnt anything to show what the ps3 is truley capable of, and it still is better looking than anything on anything, and killzone will be the great dame of graphics, you wait and see
looks like psp
this game can only be done on the 360 in a cutscene
similar strength hardware, to what?
not ps3, even if it was similar hardware, the 180s hardware cant do what ps3s hardware can, which is CG, both the rsx and cell can do movie graphics, its not about what the rsx is on paper, its the features that it is built to do, so think that the penos and zenos are similar in any way to the ps3, then you are on some serious dope, this game even is running on a low level graphics engine only using rsx, cell hasnt been used yet for rendering...
the idiot doesnt know that the cell enables cgi, the poor fool, and the rsx can synthesis hollywood quality cg with realtime, this game is not a shadow of what is to come for ps3, killzone will also surpass its trailer, and that will be over a cgi trailer
aww, little 180 boys really believe that this once again multiplatform game makes anything on the 180 superior to the ps3, aww, yeah the gpu on the 180 is superior to the rsx, but to bad your gpu along with any gpu out to day cant come close to doing what rsx can do, not to mention cell, but you know i am extremely happy you all are doing these comparisons now, but too bad they will end in about 12 days, but honestly i dont know how your still talking, none of your exclusive games show any su...
codeazrael, your first joke was the funniest(untrue)statement that i have heard on this site, boy are you funny
the game is goin over the trailer
ram is starting to look like it really isnt as meningfull as you say friends, as all games out for the ps3 are all running off the RSX alone, the cell hasnt and will not be used til killzone, cell is the real graphics power for the ps3, not RSX, that is only backup, so get off the meth
both consoles there are only 2 consoles son wii and 180, you mutve not none
like i said, the first glitches of ware exceeded the 180, so if graphics increase on the next one, diar sacrifices will be made, like that nifty blood affect, and the game will be even shorter
50 million on a game that got its start on playstation, man is microsoft funny, you microsoft are desperate this generation, but its just to bad that theres not alot more games that you all can buy into, like metal gear 4, and final fantasy 13, your 180 just cant handle games like that, what desperation, now the only thing i wanna know since that is outta the way with the 50 mil is how many tens of millions were paid just to get the game to go multiplatform anyway, it happened before the ps3 ...
you all seem to forget that games are going to keep looking better for many many many years, the ps3 aint ever maxing out, your incredibly dumb to say crysis isnt possible on the ps3 still, especially when killzone 2 was shown, when i saw it crysis really started looking like old news to me, it is old news though now, DX 9 and DX 10 is what pc fans hold so dear, but what does it matter if ps3 needs neither of them, killzone 2 is 2 different engines and they both look like cg, neither DX 9 or ...