kerriganss

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 5450

that only goes against everything they've said before about removing LAN and such..

*facepalm*

6029d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

hmmm... could be good, could be really bad...

6029d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

*sigh*

6029d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

'bout time ;)

6029d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

god the graphics... i love em

6029d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

holy moley they're coming along nicely :D

6029d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Snap!

6029d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

China china china :(

6039d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

he's suit for that role if he has the appearance as in LotR

6041d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I believe you're right... both of you really... DRM *shrug*

But LAN is still not replaceable.. by anything...

6050d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Damn right! They can't keep ignoring it!

Closing up on 100k this is madness ;)

(and not sparta!)

6050d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Awsomes! O.O

6069d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

thats so awsome bookmarked for later read :)

6071d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

**Awsome Posted wrong place at first xD

6071d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

*Edit*

6071d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

2480. Guillaume Poirier
I need LAN feature to play SC2 at work with co-workers. There is no way to connect to battle.net through the firewall / proxy. Without LAN, the only solution is to pirate it with a version including some kind of bnet emulator, which is the opposite of your idea behind removing LAN.

6077d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Easiest to say Recka, Starcraft isn't starcraft without LAN.

End of that ;)

6077d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

It's bad.. a real bad move... LAN is the essence of Starcraft.

6077d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Me like all the sc2 news ^^

6078d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Interresting.

6078d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment