Good review, ND are good at graphics/special effects and storytelling, gameplay wise, not so much. Still, UC4 is a good game and i'm scoring it 8,5/10. But it's just not the masterpiece all the fanboys call it to be.
3563d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView commentInappropriate
As fun as UC4 is, it doesn't come close to the entertainment value you"ll with the Witcher 3 for example.
Sorry dude but it doesn't come close to Forza 6 let alone FH2, for a close track racing game they should've been able to do better than that. But if the game truly is only 50% completed, you gotta think they will optimize it before release.
Like we have seen with QB, alot of little trollish site will do their best to lower the score. This is why imo, metacritic or reviews score for that matters aren't reliable to gauge a games rating. Best way will always be to make your own opinion.
What's wrong with that score, imo it's pretty much spot on, everything around 9 is good enough for an UC game. Great graphic and excellent story telling. The gameplay isn't the best out there but still good enough and it's true, like many other franchise, at the some point the pacing is affected by repetitiveness. On a technical standpoint, it's true that the framerate dips sometimes, but it's almost flawless, much better than many AAA title these days. Anyone with a ...
Frame dips , textures pops in, pacing issue and the traditional ND clunky gameplay. It still looks to be the best of the franchise so anything between 8,5/9 score looks fair. Always been a solid franchise but not masterpiece by any means
Looks awsome to me, maybe not as beautifull as Ori, but still, any old school megaman fans should be excited
Nope, VR is a gimmick, but 4k 60 fps gaming bring it on
The obvious answer is both
As fun as UC4 is, it doesn't come close to the entertainment value you"ll with the Witcher 3 for example.
I didn't read the article, but the obvious answer is, he is the most powerfull Jedi ever.
Sorry dude but it doesn't come close to Forza 6 let alone FH2, for a close track racing game they should've been able to do better than that. But if the game truly is only 50% completed, you gotta think they will optimize it before release.
Oh well, looks like forza is still the racing king
Lol Kotaku shut up everyone is entice to his own opinion, stop acting like a bunch of crybabies and start thinking by yourself
Good review, spot on on many aspect of the game.
Good Review, though the score might be a tad low, imo it's a 8/8,5/10. Good game but nowhere near masterpiece territory.
Satyr, joke or troll, call it what you want, that doesn't change my point
Like we have seen with QB, alot of little trollish site will do their best to lower the score. This is why imo, metacritic or reviews score for that matters aren't reliable to gauge a games rating. Best way will always be to make your own opinion.
Good review
E3 was way better, but it's nothing new, ND always downgrade their graphics, it was the same with UC2 and 3. They are still really nice though
What's wrong with that score, imo it's pretty much spot on, everything around 9 is good enough for an UC game. Great graphic and excellent story telling. The gameplay isn't the best out there but still good enough and it's true, like many other franchise, at the some point the pacing is affected by repetitiveness. On a technical standpoint, it's true that the framerate dips sometimes, but it's almost flawless, much better than many AAA title these days. Anyone with a ...
Frame dips , textures pops in, pacing issue and the traditional ND clunky gameplay. It still looks to be the best of the franchise so anything between 8,5/9 score looks fair. Always been a solid franchise but not masterpiece by any means
Well to be fair, this could be said about 99% of games nowadays
It really is mediocre at best