Wasn't this question asked last year, when Nintendo say they weren't having a conference?
Basically...
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Because a Japanese company is going to make an American head of their company. That's plausible.
1. that's the movie.
2. Metacritic does a weird way of averaging a score especially when it comes to one that use the 5 out of 5 scale.
Make it scary, make it feel like the player is vulnerable. There's nothing quite like traversing a derelict area, you ammo on low hoping the next section will have much needed supplies and not lead to you death.
This, I see very little that entices me about the game. I think this guy need to pull his head out of his ass and fawning over a game just because he seems to blindly loves the developer.
Almost 40 minutes?
If only we could get another Dino Crisis like the first 2.
What do you mean going to. The game is out an I don't anyone who's playing it.
Or maybe the game doesn't look very good. And see as the game is being released on everything and still hasn't made it's goal could say something about the game itself. They have not shown anything all that interesting.
Mighty No. 9 had a lot of information regarding the game, plus the fact that it was being developed by the creator of Mega Man was almost a guarantee it would be worth playing.
Hey every one, read it in this voice. It's kind of funny.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
It means to removed or expel.
Yeah with games like Infamous and......
30 fps... that sucks.
Gamers, I would hope.
I really wouldn't call a 31 minute video review "straight to the point".
This is the equivalent to complaining about the hood ornament of a car when you should be looking at the engine.
I'll wait when the game is cheap, I doubt it will be worth $60.
http://gamerant.com/no-new-...