fps always sells better on 360 due to it being the average 360 gamers favourite genre.
hmmm the next fanboy war has started this time its fanboys of fanboys. i cant believe there are people on here sticking up for 360 and ps3 fanboys when they are all just as bad as each other.
360 and ps3 fanboys are as bad as each other it just depends on what site you go on. gametrailers forums are full of ps3 fanboys while i tend to find gamespots forums are full of 360 fanboys. The guy who wrote the article is most probably a 360 fanboy or something. i own both a 360 and ps3 so i have no reason to talk crap about a console i already own. some people take fanboys far too seriously and should just ignore them rather than retaliating back with stupid fanboy comments.
This is worse than i thought to be honest. i hoping that time is at least accurate because when most devs give a length to their games i usually complete them about an hour or two faster than they say.
natal may be cheaper but fun is more important than price. personally i'm not interested in either but if i had to get either natal or move id get move.
i will be getting this day one.
this looks cool but im sticking with my 3gs
natal and arc are crap ordinary controllers are the best.
another inconsistant review from edge i see. i dont mind low scores but surely lbp and the halo games aren't 5 scores better.
i think all the worker at infinty ward should quit there jobs and form a new studio. im sure a publisher would fund them very quickly because they would make billions.
natal is crap people need to face the fact that the ordinary controller is the best way to play games for now. Both natal and arc are crap unless your a 12 year old who plays games with their grandma
i like the idea of games on demand, i still prefer getting a physical copy but games on demand is convenient sometimes. Its got two problems though and that is the games are overly expensive considering its most probably cheaper to sell games on demand. The other problem is that i only have a 20gb 360 hdd and they expect me to buy a 120gb hdd for a stupid price.
sony have the right idea advertising there own games. ive seen a heavy rain advert on tv about 5 times and i don't watch much tv. why should sony waste money advertising ff13 when it is bound to sell more on ps3 considering they had a head start in japan.
it sounds the like the reviewer only like games with explosions round every corner. The score is his opinion and there is nothing wrong with that but perhaps a reviewer who at least likes story driven games should have been reviewing this game. its like letting a person who hates fps games review crysis, halo or killzone
I think there is a load of hd making of videos on the disc aswell and that will take up a lot of space. there is nothing wrong with prerendered videos because they are usually better quality than normal in game and they don't take as long to make as cgi cutscenes which caused ff13 to take so long to be released.
this is why you have the ps3 as the main platform and port to the 360.
i live in eu so i cant get them. at least i still have an original sealed copy of ff9 (i also own an unsealed one which i play). I got the game twice for my birthday years ago and never bothered to sell it because it could be worth something in 10-20 years time.
does he pull his headlines out his ass.
dvd is mainly fine but the main problem is games like grand theft auto. if rockstar want to make a bigger map for the next game which i think they should the game would probably have to be on two discs. Some people think this isn't a problem but i would find it very annoying changing discs every time i cross the map to a new area.
i didnt think the uk had an official way of tracking game number like in the US