CRank: 5Score: 3780

Yep, you said it. "Bonus" content. Dice said they were gonna give us bonus content and did not disclose what the bonus content was going to be when we first bought premium. It's your own damn fault for thinking the bonus content is gonna be one thing when in reality its going to be something else.

4937d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

No, it's about the masses. They don't try to accommodate 1 friggin person. Get that through your skull. Honestly, I hate EA, but Dice I don't have a problem with and I doubt the artbook had anything to do with EA's decision.

4937d ago 2 agree9 disagreeView comment

Wah Wah Wah! Cry some more you babies. If you buy premium you're getting 10 dollars off than if you were buying each map pack separately. You also get new guns and two weeks early access. Maybe some people like artwork? Quit having "it's all about me" syndrome.

4937d ago 11 agree28 disagreeView comment

Apparently, you are THAT dumb. MAG and BF3 use different gaming engines. Just because one game can handle certain things doesn't mean another can do the same. BF3's engine is far more complex than MAG's engine, especially with the destructible environments.

4952d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I wouldn't even include a single player. Such a waste of resources. Look at the expansions with Premium, $50 for 20+ multiplayer maps; whereas, BF3 Vanilla has 9 maps and a single player for $60?

4952d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Is this person really canceling her Xbox Gold just because they didn't have female avatar clothing? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quit your whining, lady.

4952d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Glad you're not running my business. Last I heard Sony was losing money. Microsoft is a business first and foremost. Xbox is the product and to make additional money they have ads. I'm sure the shareholders for Microsoft are not complaining.

4979d ago 10 agree13 disagreeView comment

Well Blizzard is known to support their game with patches to try and balance their games as much as possible. WoW was so horribly broken with pvp when it first came out, and now it's not so bad.

5028d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Dude talks about difficulty when he hasn't even gotten to inferno mode yet. Psh, dumb article. Also, people in his comments section complain about not being able to start inferno mode from the start. Have people not played D2? Heck, have they not played D3? To enter Hell you have to be level 50 and to enter inferno you have to be level 60. This game doesn't even really start UNTIL you hit 60 and everything before that is just to get you acclimated to your skills and enemies. If ...

5028d ago 8 agree1 disagreeView comment

You also don't use a comparison with apples an oranges that's irrelevant. Diablo 2 and Diablo 3 are different games AND they are separated by 12 years. You dot use the same formula and slap a "3" after it and call it good. If you've played the beta you'll know it feels a lot different than D2 and in a good way.

3 passive skills is a lot, you want to talk about diversity? This gives you diversity. On the monk skill tree there are about 12 differe...

5042d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Your character is going to be unique because s/he will only have 6 active skills that will be useable and 3 (I think) passive skills. On top of that each active skill has 6 runes, which affect the skill differently. Blizzard has said they got rid of the attributes from D2 because it was redundant and in the end they really didn't affect that characters all that much once you maxed your character out.

Having played D2 and D3 beta I'm going to have to say this new app...

5042d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Don't know much about CoD, but I'm pretty sure it had dedicated servers of some sorts. I doubt a person connection could handle every player in the game.

5046d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The article said...

"The approach to combat is inspired by Dark Souls, Kingdoms of Amalur and Batman: Arkham City, in that it features systems that are simple to grasp but filled with depth."

So it basically means that the fighting system may or may not be anything like the fighting systems in the games mentioned, but will be a system that will have depth to it. No where does it say it's going to be a copy of those three.

5077d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

This game sounds awesome!

5077d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sweet! First one was awesome! Definitely underrated.

5082d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

lol, dyack is such a turd monkey trying to stay relevant in this world.

5087d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

Game looks the same as it did 12-13 years ago or whenever it first came out on Dreamcast albeit better graphics. So how is it that people are excited about this game?

5089d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I think YOU are the one that actually epic failed since you failed to realize what he writes is true. AMD dropped the ATI name a while ago.

http://m.zdnet.com/blog/har...

5093d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Actually, if you want to get technical AMD dropped the ATI name a year or two ago. So the new Radeons are no longer called "ATI Radeons HD xxxx," but rather called "AMD Radeon xxxx" or just simply "Radeon HD xxxx."

5093d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

"IGN pulled the same crap and worse on multiple games such as their most recent review of dynasty warriors gundam . But of course people only suddenly notice on bigger games "

So you are basically saying DW:G got a bad review too, but wasn't highly publicized as the Ninja Gaiden review.

And having played a few games of the Dynasty Warriors series back in the day and the first Dynasty Warriors Gundam, I don't really think there is a way to su...

5095d ago 2 agree5 disagreeView comment