...that Haze is worth a playthrough.
Purchasing this game would be 60 bucks down the toilet...and rentals don't really help the Dev.
Ohhh wait...
Point being, what you just said was retarded.
The devs failed because the games sucked and they spent a lot of money making them.
Timesplitters was the only game that this dev got right. Haze was crap.
I don't wish bad things on companies, but at the same time I would have to be dumb not to see this one coming.
Reported as such!
It seems reasonable.
PS3 is more multimedia centric and the users are older (like to tinker with the system more)
Seems about right to me.
Just another boring 2009 console speculation article.
I recommend other users do the same if you want this garbage to stop.
I am an unbiased gamer and N4G and the 10 negative PS3 articles a day is getting on my nerves.
Who can read every negative article and actually learn something new?
How many freaking articles we have to read questioning this or that regarding XBOX or the PS3
"The PS3 is dead"
"Blu Ray is dead"
"RRoD is bad"
"Cliffy B is a buttmuch"
Do we need 10 articles a day like this?!
LAME!
...oops fixed...I hate Gamespot.
Ok these stupid Gamestop articles suck....I'm sorry.
You CHOOSE to shop at Gamestop....You CHOOSE to accept their pricing.... YOU CHOOSE to not sell on eBay or Amazon....This is consumer choice.
The Gamestop I go to has rocked for years. I go there to reserve games....pay for my Game Informer magazine subscription...etc.
I am in no way an advocate. I will buy a new game anywhere, but I dont HATE Gamestop for being a company that makes profit...that...
But then again they do need improvement.
Anyways Capcom US rocks, it's too bad JP doesn't recognize what we enjoy out of a good RPG.
Also very few RPGs (not MMOs...single player RPG) do great in the states and that crap is spendy to port (english dubs...etc)
...and fall til I hit the ground.
Anyone else do this back in the day?
lol
The game was hyped up and people were starving for a good sandbox game. Also all of the gamers, like myself, were waiting for what came next in the series (after SA)
Keep in mind all of the mainstream attention it got...even fricken Time did a story on it.
Also, user hype, media hype...it was the perfect storm for awesome sales. GTA IV is a must buy, must play experience.
I think the next game in the series will sell well also, but am I am also gue...
I'm telling you....check it out.
Everyone in here praising SR2 is just like you, promise.
I am a huge GTA fan in general and it was hard to admit SR2 fed me what I was really looking for in GTA IV.
GTA IV is beautiful, it really is, but SR2 is just plain old fun. I personally liked the story too, but thats me.
Check it out either way!
...and don't forget about all of the customization options in SR2.
I hate giving SR2 more credit than GTA IV, but I know which one I had more fun with (and that is what matters)
SR2 was the king of the sandbox last year in my eyes. GTA IV just stripped down too many of its fun stuff to do.
For some reason I think most GTA Purists (the people that used to play SA and VC) would prefer SR2 over GTA IV, but that is just my opinion.
But honestly, the ones who should be laughed off are the ones who approved this garbage.
Can't you redeem yourself and have the admins remove this crappy story?
I mean, its all obviously garbage.
Silogon,
If you are legit then you would have already posted the pics etc.... I call bullsh*t.
Prove me wrong, but anyone buying this crap right now is an idiot.
Also you are claiming to have insider info from Gamesblow directly.
That guy (gamesblow) never claimed to be an insider (if you can remember) he was just some dude who went to a gaming convention and supposedly saw a game called Tears of Blood.
It's a bunch ...
...and I recommend anyone with a brain to do the same.
This is bullcrap you can smell a hundred miles away.
With a name like Death, you would think you are cool....I guess names aren't everything.
Anyways (getting back on topic) this is a story posted on Informationweek and many other reputable sites have talked about the beta leak of Windows 7.
Also, this is a beta we are talking about. A non-purchasable product. I wouldn't doubt if MS really cares about this. They probably like the feedback they have been getting.
I'm not speaking for anyone but myself, but ...