it just doesn't seem to work.
it's going to be the other way around when halo 3 makes it's debut.
i knew it was nothing new when i say the gameplay graphics.
WOW! now my mom will definitely buy me one.
once you beat it, you realize that you've wasted over 60 bucks. that's why i always say that every game must be multiplayer, but this comment really has nothing to do with the article above.
start working on marvel vs capcom 3 immediately.
and the winner is burnout paradise.
a billion dollar charge from Microsoft would be like taking only a thousand dollars from them.
as much as i hated geometry in high school, i wouldn't want a game about it in a war.
1. their designer's(wii)
2. the majority of their games(360&PS3&wii)
3. their hardware(360)
4. their price(360&PS3)
5. their controllers(wii)
6. their CEOs and chairmans(360&PS3)
7. their marketing staff(360&PS3)
8. their graphics(wii)
whoever wrote this article better regret after saying this game is the best multiplayer game on wii. just wait until brawl hits the stores, then you could write your apologies. i don't care, i don't even have a wii, i have a 360. i'm a hardcore gamer, that's why i don't play wii.
what's this got anything to do with the videogame industry.
the multiplayer is just completely a failure. no cooperative campaign. enough said.
whens retrospective part 5?
oh gee i can't way any longer for this
tony hawk and all the other skateboarding game are just old generation games and should just stay there.
halo 3 still looks just like part 2, but if they take a look at some of the features from gears of war, then i'm sure halo 3 will just be fine.
so is the smoke ball a good thing or a bad thing.
i'm not a fan of the DS either, but it's killing the PSP.
zzzz zzzz snor zzzzzzzzzzzzz snor zzz snor zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz snor zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzz snor zzzzzzz snor zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz snor zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz z zzzzzzzzzz snor zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz snoe