This is a business, there is a need for advertisement. And these things are on a time slot, do you really expect to see someone playing a game in commercials? of course not, they will have to make a trailer. It's about getting the product out and making you anticipate it, E3 is a big event that is sure to have eyes. It would only be a problem if, and only if, the only thing we know about the game is from cgi footage but this is absolutely never the case. I would agree with Killzone 2 at l...
I like Cracked as much as the next guy, they're pretty funny. But this one is definitely not dead on and has things wrong.
"You don't care what games actually are" No, it's called a preview. They give a short amount of info and wait for the game to be in a presentable level to slowly give you info and keep the game in your mind. What do you expect, to show you everything there is to do in the first god damn trailer? Which goes to my next point, THIS IS NOT THE ON...
Killzone always made me feel like visual galore with little to no soul behind conception. It's just lacking something for me to find the game fun, I stick to the amazingling built multiplayer from Battlefield for my first person shooter.
Killzone shadow falls is an open world?
It's in comparison to the numbers the consoles can pull taking into account how much time they've been out. Only 50 millions with bigger time frame is very adequate in this case.
Okay, main point of his article. Corporation are a business and thus they want money. *Surprising* To which I say, really? Is this news for you? Now Sony are in the business, and unlike Microsoft they've done what to us, logically should never been question. And we praise them for that, yes. And they do deserve the praise. Because when your other major competitor is doing it you could easily follow ship and screw us too. But they didn't, and for that, as happy customers we express our...
I find it so that by playing with randoms I was force to become versatile enough to exploit every class pro to the best of my ability, you will suffer some loses and sometimes find your self against a squad that dominates the entire team but it certainly helps you explore different tactics. I am rather patient though.
Santa Monica is number two in the Sony team in my opinion,*I bet you can guess who's my number one Puppy* very excited to see what they can do outside of their epic.
And this is key, it gives us the option to completely kill anybody who decides that shit it's a good idea.
When the only bad thing about the PS4 is 5 dollars a month.... Then yeah, good Job.
As for the article. No new exclusive announced. I'm guessing he means exclusively Triple A titles? And The Order. *Santa Monica* says hi.
Excuse me, did I just read that Microsoft offers exclusive freedoms on a field where Sony doesn't have any at all? And that exclusivity that comes with exclusive restrictions, is a good thing? What?
Teabags girl.
Gets accused of rape.
Okay, why do people keep telling 64 players were confirm for consoles... I need a source.
grading conferences? how does that even work?
They can and have make great games, if they want to get a bigger audience. Let them be, it is their studios. Their choice.
I don't know how they're going about this, But notice the C4 is in the recon class. Is balance restore to that poor class?
There is no way to reply to you, Matt. So I will reply to myself.
I'm not denying the man his voice, in fact I stated how those who happen to have the same taste as him would find it helpful.
The problem with criticism is always subjective comes because it*criticism* tries to analyze what the certain matter is trying to do and accomplish, what that work of art stands for. At the very least it begs for you to make an effort to understand the author/authors...
Okay, no. Of course the professionals wouldn't get on this kind of deal but there is a very big problem with what he did and Naughty Dog got it right. In a review, you are analyzing the game for what it tries to be and what it has accomplished. You need to be objective because the point is to do a proper and in depth research of everything the game stands for. Your personal affinity and things you enjoy should not sway the way you rate this game. This is a rather simple thing to ask, and ...
"The site has girl on the title, MUST BE WRITTEN BY A GIRL" It ins't, you guy should take a timeout. *And the amount of people that try to refuse the constant sexism lol*
Anyways, Everytime I read a review that's below 8, I wonder. Do majority of all games get 4-5 in these sites? I haven't play the game but just in animation/sound/world design/ and just overall production value, I know for a fact Naughty dog delivers and no one has one complain on these front. Wh...
You made it sound like the franchise was, not just the original. "Has always been" as if it continuous to be and has a history of being exclusive. If you add Dead Rising 2 that contradicts that thought.
A better way to phrase it would be, Dead Rising was an Xbox exclusive. So yeah, clearly not the same. This is made more than obvious when you say "But if you want DR, buy One" Speaking for the franchise as a whole. It's bad communication in your part.